Paper · 2019 · Agricultural Sciences

Nutritional Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum L.) Varieties as Influenced by Combined Application of Human Urine and Rock Phosphate

Adebiyi Samuel Egbebi; Ezekiel Akinkunmi Akinrinde

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in the quality of food produced in the sub-Saharan Africa and organic fertilizers can be used as palliative for eradicating malnutrition and improving the livelihood of the populace. A study was conducted in two phases, 4 × 5 × 2 and 2 × 4 factorial experiments in a completely randomized design with three replicates at the Department of Agronomy screenhouse, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. In the first experiment, five N levels (0, 20, 40, 60 and 80 kgN/ha) were combined with two P levels (0 and 20 kgP/ha) using urea and single superphosphate, respectively and four varieties (Roma VF, UC82B, Rio grande and Roma savana) of tomatoes were used. In the second experiment, optimum rates (60 kgN and 20 kgP/ha) from the first experiment formed the basis for the application of urea + SSP, urine + ORP, urea + SSP + urine + ORP and control. The best-performing varieties (Rio grande and Roma savana) in the first experiment were used. Data were subjected to analysis of variance. Combined application of N and P had higher N use efficiency and nutrient uptake than sole application of N or P. Urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures were best for nutrient uptake and crop utilization of N and P. Increasing N levels led to decrease in nutrient use efficiency. Application of urine + ORP and urea + SSP gave better fruit qualities. The descending order of varietal superiority with respect to nutrient uptake, utilization and quality was: Rio grande > Roma savana > Roma VF > UC82B. Thus, urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures have great potentials as substitutes for urea + SSP in the production of tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N and P increased N use efficiency and nutrient uptake over sole nutrient application.

Treatment
Combined application of N and Pe0
Outcome
N use efficiency and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole application of N or Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of N and P had higher N use efficiency and nutrient uptake than sole application of N or P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thus, urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures have great potentials as substitutes for urea + SSP in the production of tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urine and ORP mixtures performed best for nutrient uptake and N and P use.

Treatment
Urine + ORP based fertilizer mixturese0e1
Outcome
nutrient uptake and crop utilization of N and Pe0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures were best for nutrient uptake and crop utilization of N and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1228 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thus, urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures have great potentials as substitutes for urea + SSP in the production of tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1641 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N reduced nutrient use efficiency.

Treatment
Increasing N levelse0
Outcome
nutrient use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N levels led to decrease in nutrient use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thus, urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures have great potentials as substitutes for urea + SSP in the production of tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urine plus ORP improved fruit quality.

Treatment
urine + ORPe0e1
Outcome
fruit qualitiese0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of urine + ORP and urea + SSP gave better fruit qualities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1363 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thus, urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures have great potentials as substitutes for urea + SSP in the production of tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea plus SSP improved fruit quality.

Treatment
urea + SSPe0e1
Outcome
fruit qualitiese0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of urine + ORP and urea + SSP gave better fruit qualities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1363 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thus, urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures have great potentials as substitutes for urea + SSP in the production of tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rio grande ranked above Roma savana, Roma VF and UC82B for nutrient uptake, utilization and quality.

Material
Rio grandee0
Outcome
nutrient uptake, utilization and qualitye0
Direction
descending ordere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The descending order of varietal superiority with respect to nutrient uptake, utilization and quality was: Rio grande > Roma savana > Roma VF > UC82B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1514 · show in text ↑
e1

“Thus, urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures have great potentials as substitutes for urea + SSP in the production of tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1641 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Urine and ORP mixtures have potential to substitute for urea and SSP in tomato production.

Outcome
substitutes for urea + SSPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, urine + ORP based fertilizer mixtures have great potentials as substitutes for urea + SSP in the production of tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1641 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.