Paper · 2013

Large scale validation of an am fungal-based biofertilizer and its management with rhizobium for bean production, in central and western cuba

Roberto E Rivera; Alejandro Espinosa Calderón; M.C. Naploes; et al.

2
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Forty workshops were given to teach farmers how to improve fertilizer use efficiency in bean through the use of biofertilizers. Experiments were set up in 50 fields on commercial farms. Two treatments were applied in all fields: coating of bean seeds with an inoculant of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (EcoMic®) and a non-inoculated control. In 15 fields, a third treatment, EcoMic ® plus a rhizobial inoculant with a nodulation enhancement factor (Azofert®), was applied. All field received half the recommended rate of N-P-K. The effect of EcoMic® was positive in all fields. Yield increase ranged between 0.2 and 0.4 t ha-1. The combined application of EcoMic ® and Azofert® yield was additive and averaged about 0.58 t ha-1, an increment corresponding to 52.5% yield increase.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coating with the arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculant EcoMic increased bean yield by 0.2 to 0.4 t ha-1 over a non-inoculated control, with a positive effect in all fields.

Taxon
beane1
Treatment
coating of bean seeds with an inoculant of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (EcoMic®)e1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.2 and 0.4 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
positive in all fieldse3
Comparator
non-inoculated controle2

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increase ranged between 0.2 and 0.4 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–625 · show in text ↑
e1

“coating of bean seeds with an inoculant of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (EcoMic®)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–310 · show in text ↑
e2

“a non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–339 · show in text ↑
e3

“The effect of EcoMic® was positive in all fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application of the AM fungal inoculant EcoMic and the rhizobial inoculant Azofert gave an additive yield increase in bean, averaging about 0.58 t ha-1 (52.5% increase).

Taxon
beane1
Treatment
combined application of EcoMic ® and Azofert®e0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobial inoculante2symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.58 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
52.5% yield increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of EcoMic ® and Azofert® yield was additive and averaged about 0.58 t ha-1, an increment corresponding to 52.5% yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“coating of bean seeds with an inoculant of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (EcoMic®)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–310 · show in text ↑
e2

“a rhizobial inoculant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–409 · show in text ↑

storage · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.