Paper · 2017 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

DEPTH OF SULFUR FERTILIZATION AND NITROGEN TOPDRESSING AS AFFECTING NODULATION AND GRAIN YIELD OF COMMON BEAN

Adriano Stephan Nascente; Pedro Marques Silveira; José Geraldo Silva; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Depth of sulfur (S) fertilization can affect common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) development and a better understanding of its interaction with nitrogen topdressing could help to improve common bean grain yield in soils under Cerrado. The objective of this study was to determine nodulation, grain yield and yield components of common bean as affected by S fertilization depth and N topdressing. Two experiments were carried out, with and without nitrogen topdressing fertilization. For both experiments, the experimental designed was a randomized block in a factorial arrangement 4 x 2, with four replications. Treatments were the combination of sulfur rates (0, 20, 40, and 60 kg ha-1) at two depths (0.06 and 0.12 m) in two growing season (2014 and 2015). The application of S in the uppermost layer provided significant increases in the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and grain yield of common bean. Fertilization with S provided significant increases in grain yield of common bean, in the absence and presence of N at topdressing. S fertilization depth did not affect number of nodules, root and shoot dry matter of common bean. The fertilization with nitrogen topdressing provided larger number of pods per plant and grain yield in relation to the treatment without N and inoculation with rhizobia. Thus, the sulfated fertilization should be considered in farming systems aiming for high yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-layer sulfur significantly increased pods per common bean plant.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
S in the uppermost layere0
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of S in the uppermost layer provided significant increases in the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and grain yield of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-layer sulfur significantly increased seeds per pod.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
S in the uppermost layere0
Outcome
number of seeds per pode0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of S in the uppermost layer provided significant increases in the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and grain yield of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-layer sulfur significantly increased grain yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
S in the uppermost layere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of S in the uppermost layer provided significant increases in the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and grain yield of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilization increased grain yield with and without nitrogen topdressing.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Fertilization with Se0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
in the absence and presence of N at topdressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with S provided significant increases in grain yield of common bean, in the absence and presence of N at topdressing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur depth did not affect bean nodule number.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
S fertilization depthe0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S fertilization depth did not affect number of nodules, root and shoot dry matter of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur depth did not affect bean root or shoot dry matter.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
S fertilization depthe0
Outcome
root and shoot dry mattere0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S fertilization depth did not affect number of nodules, root and shoot dry matter of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing increased pods per plant versus no N with rhizobial inoculation.

Taxon
COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
nitrogen topdressinge0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
treatment without N and inoculation with rhizobiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilization with nitrogen topdressing provided larger number of pods per plant and grain yield in relation to the treatment without N and inoculation with rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“COMMON BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen topdressing increased grain yield versus no N with rhizobial inoculation.

Taxon
COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
nitrogen topdressinge0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
treatment without N and inoculation with rhizobiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilization with nitrogen topdressing provided larger number of pods per plant and grain yield in relation to the treatment without N and inoculation with rhizobia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“COMMON BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–109 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sulfur fertilization for high-yield farming systems.

Taxon
COMMON BEANPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
sulfated fertilization should be considerede0
Qualifier
farming systems aiming for high yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, the sulfated fertilization should be considered in farming systems aiming for high yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“COMMON BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–109 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sulfur atom · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

35 papers: 20 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 121 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 121 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.