Paper · 2019 · HortScience

Hydrolyzed Organic Fish Fertilizer and Poultry Litter Influence Yield and Rhizosphere Ecology of Sweetpotato

Lauren Lindsey; Raymon Shange; Ramble O. Ankumah; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Organic fertilization techniques have become an attractive alternative to conventional techniques, but there remains interest in their impact on rhizosphere ecology. This study was aimed at assessing the impacts of various organic fertilizer amendments on storage root yield, chemical, biochemical, and microbial factors in the rhizosphere ecosystem and the bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere ecosystem. Four sweetpotato cultivars (J6/66, NCC-58, TU Purple, and Whatley/Loretan) and four organic fertilizer treatments [poultry litter, Megabloom (fish protein), NPK, and an untreated control] were used in the study. The experiments were conducted as a randomized complete block design with a 4 × 4 factorial treatment arrangement and three replications. Fertilizer treatments were split-applied at the rate of 134–67–67 kg·ha −1 NPK equivalent based on soil test recommendations 1 and 4 weeks after planting as single bands 15 cm from the plants and organic amendments were calculated based on total N content. Rhizosphere soil samples were collected at harvest and analyzed for soil pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), bacterial 16S rDNA, and selected soil enzymes. Organic amendments did not affect storage root yield or percent dry matter but enhanced both the mass and number of US#1 storage roots. Rhizosphere pH varied depending on cultivar and cultivar response varied with pH and ranged from 6.1 to 6.8, whereas SOC was similar regardless of the amendment. The impact of fertilizers was evident as Megabloom (fish protein) treatment suppressed the relative abundance (RA) of nitrifiers ( Nitrosococcus and Nitrosomonadaceae ). Also, the rhizosphere of ‘Whatley/Loretan’ seemed to have been a beneficial habitat for populations of common nitrogen-fixing bacteria Bradyrhizobium elkanii , and Rhodospirillaceae sp. as their RA increased significantly in the rhizosphere. That bacteria associated with carbon and nitrogen cycling under aerobic conditions were found to be ubiquitous in the rhizosphere of sweetpotato, suggesting that certain amendments positively impacted the populations of nitrogen-cycling bacteria, thus making them a viable alternative to NPK when considering increasing or sustaining yield while promoting long-term soil health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments did not affect sweetpotato storage root yield or dry matter.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Organic amendmentse0
Outcome
storage root yield or percent dry mattere0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic amendments did not affect storage root yield or percent dry matter but enhanced both the mass and number of US#1 storage roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments increased the mass and number of US#1 sweetpotato storage roots.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Organic amendmentse0
Outcome
mass and number of US#1 storage rootse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic amendments did not affect storage root yield or percent dry matter but enhanced both the mass and number of US#1 storage roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweetpotato rhizosphere pH varied by cultivar between 6.1 and 6.8.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
cultivare0
Outcome
Rhizosphere pHe0
Direction
variede0
Value
6.1 to 6.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizosphere pH varied depending on cultivar and cultivar response varied with pH and ranged from 6.1 to 6.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon was similar across sweetpotato fertilizer amendments.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
amendmente0
Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOC was similar regardless of the amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Megabloom suppressed the relative abundance of Nitrosococcus in the sweetpotato rhizosphere.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Megabloom (fish protein) treatmente0
Interactor
NitrosococcusNitrosococcuse0other
Outcome
relative abundance (RA) of nitrifierse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Megabloom (fish protein) treatment suppressed the relative abundance (RA) of nitrifiers ( Nitrosococcus and Nitrosomonadaceae )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Megabloom suppressed the relative abundance of Nitrosomonadaceae in the sweetpotato rhizosphere.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Megabloom (fish protein) treatmente0
Interactor
NitrosomonadaceaeNitrosomonadaceaee0other
Outcome
relative abundance (RA) of nitrifierse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Megabloom (fish protein) treatment suppressed the relative abundance (RA) of nitrifiers ( Nitrosococcus and Nitrosomonadaceae )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium elkanii increased significantly in the Whatley/Loretan sweetpotato rhizosphere.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Whatley/Loretane0
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium elkaniiBradyrhizobium elkaniie0symbiont
Outcome
RAe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rhizosphere of ‘Whatley/Loretan’ seemed to have been a beneficial habitat for populations of common nitrogen-fixing bacteria Bradyrhizobium elkanii , and Rhodospirillaceae sp. as their RA increased significantly in the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The relative abundance of Rhodospirillaceae sp. increased significantly in the Whatley/Loretan sweetpotato rhizosphere.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Whatley/Loretane0
Interactor
Rhodospirillaceae sp.Rhodospirillaceaee0symbiont
Outcome
RAe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rhizosphere of ‘Whatley/Loretan’ seemed to have been a beneficial habitat for populations of common nitrogen-fixing bacteria Bradyrhizobium elkanii , and Rhodospirillaceae sp. as their RA increased significantly in the rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.