Paper · 2018 · Cassowary

Beberapa sifat kimia tanah, serapan P, K, Fe, dan pertumbuhan Ubijalar ((Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lamb) akibat pemberian ekstrak krandalit, fraksi humat dan kalium pada Ultisol Warmare

Sapriansyah Nusan; Ishak Musaad; Irnanda A.F. Djuuna

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The aims of this research were to study some soil chemical properties, P, K, Fe uptake and sweet potato growth as the result of Crandalitte Extract, Humat Fraction, and Potassium application on Ultisol Warmare. The pot experiment was conducted in the Screen house, Department of Soil Science Faculty of Agriculture, University of Papua Manokwari. The pot experiment has been done using Completed Randomize Design with 7 treatments and four replications , namely: A0 = no fertilizer (treatment); A1 = 100% crandalitte extract + 0% organic fraction + 0% potassium; A2 = 80% crandalitte extract + 10% organic fraction + 10% potassium; A3 = 60% crandalitte extract + 20% organic fraction +2 0% potassium; A4 = 40% crandalitte extract + 30% organic fraction + 30% potassium; A5 = 20% crandalitte extract + 40% organic fraction + 40% potassium, and; A6 = 0% crandalitte extract + 50% organic fraction + 50% potassium. The dosage of each treatment was 100-liter ha-1 (4 g Pot -1). Some soil chemical characteristics were analyzed for pH (H2O), pH (KCl), N-Total, C-organic, P-available, K-total, and Al-exchangeable. P, K, Fe concentrations. The plant growth variables were measured mainly for long steam on 5, 6, 7 and 8 weeks after planting, biomass of trubus, Data were analyzed using statistical analyses of Analysis of Variance (F Test) and DMRT test. The result showed that the application of crandalitte extract, humic fraction and potassium was significantly increased the status of P-available and H-exchangeable, but not affected significantly for other soil chemical characteristics (pH H2O, pH KCl, C-organic percentage, N-total, and Al-exchangeable). Fresh and dry weight of sweet potato trubus were also significantly affected by those application, however it was not affected significantly on long steam; wet weight and dry weight of root and also root length of sweet potato. Among the treatments, the A2 treatment (80% EFC: 10% Organic fraction: 10% Potassium) showed a better value of the status P-available, H-exchangeable and the biomass of trubus. This might be related to the characteristic of acid mineral soil that need high P fertilizer and the balance application of organic matter and potassium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The applications significantly increased soil P availability and H exchangeability.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
crandalitte extract, humic fraction and potassiume0
Outcome
P-available and H-exchangeablee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no fertilizere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of crandalitte extract, humic fraction and potassium was significantly increased the status of P-available and H-exchangeable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1514 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“A0 = no fertilizer (treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The applications did not significantly affect the other stated soil chemical characteristics.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase2
Treatment
crandalitte extract, humic fraction and potassiume1
Outcome
pH H2O, pH KCl, C-organic percentage, N-total, and Al-exchangeablee0
Direction
not affected significantlye0
Comparator
no fertilizere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“not affected significantly for other soil chemical characteristics (pH H2O, pH KCl, C-organic percentage, N-total, and Al-exchangeable)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1655 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of crandalitte extract, humic fraction and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1441 · show in text ↑
e2

“sweet potato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“A0 = no fertilizer (treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The applications significantly affected sweet potato shoot fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
crandalitte extract, humic fraction and potassiume1
Outcome
Fresh and dry weight of sweet potato trubuse0
Comparator
no fertilizere2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh and dry weight of sweet potato trubus were also significantly affected by those application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1754 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of crandalitte extract, humic fraction and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1441 · show in text ↑
e2

“A0 = no fertilizer (treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The applications did not significantly affect sweet potato stem length or root weight and length.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
crandalitte extract, humic fraction and potassiume1
Outcome
long steam; wet weight and dry weight of root and also root lengthe0
Direction
not affected significantlye0
Comparator
no fertilizere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was not affected significantly on long steam; wet weight and dry weight of root and also root length of sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1883 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of crandalitte extract, humic fraction and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1441 · show in text ↑
e2

“A0 = no fertilizer (treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A2 gave better soil P availability, H exchangeability and shoot biomass than the other treatments.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
A2 treatment (80% EFC: 10% Organic fraction: 10% Potassium)e0
Outcome
P-available, H-exchangeable and the biomass of trubuse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments, the A2 treatment (80% EFC: 10% Organic fraction: 10% Potassium) showed a better value of the status P-available, H-exchangeable and the biomass of trubus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–2061 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet potato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–110 · show in text ↑

other · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

botanical · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

potassium · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.