Claim · model-written summary
Organic amendments did not affect sweetpotato storage root yield or dry matter.
- Taxon
- Sweetpotato
_Flower.jpg?width=60)
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- Organic amendmentse0
- Outcome
- storage root yield or percent dry mattere0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Organic amendments did not affect storage root yield or percent dry matter but enhanced both the mass and number of US#1 storage roots”
t0“Sweetpotato”
Title
Lauren Lindsey; Raymon Shange; Ramble O. Ankumah; et al. HortScience 2019. doi:10.21273/hortsci13740-18
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Organic amendments increased the mass and number of US#1 sweetpotato storage roots.
- Association Sweetpotato rhizosphere pH varied by cultivar between 6.1 and 6.8.
- Intervention effect Soil organic carbon was similar across sweetpotato fertilizer amendments.
- Intervention effect Megabloom suppressed the relative abundance of Nitrosococcus in the sweetpotato rhizosphere.
- Intervention effect Megabloom suppressed the relative abundance of Nitrosomonadaceae in the sweetpotato rhizosphere.
- Observation The relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium elkanii increased significantly in the Whatley/Loretan sweetpotato rhizosphere.
- Observation The relative abundance of Rhodospirillaceae sp. increased significantly in the Whatley/Loretan sweetpotato rhizosphere.