Paper · 2018

A case study in the growth performance of pineapple (MD2) intercropping with different rubber species / Nik Mohamad Amershazwan Nik Azlan

Nik Azlan; Nik Mohamad Amershazwan

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rubber tree is one of major crop in Malaysia since the old day. During the replanting season for rubber tree and the immature stage of rubber the farmer has zero income from it. It is because during that period rubber tree cannot be tapping. So, by doing the intercropping the problem with income can be solved. This case study is to see the growth performance of pineapple crop (MD2) when it intercropped with seven rubber species. During this study the primary data of pineapple growth were collected based on parameter which is height, number of leaves, length of leaves and leaf area. The data is collected at Jelebu Negeri Sembilan and the duration of study is February to May. The result is show that there a significant different with all the parameter on pineapple growth performance when intercrop with seven rubber species. The highest growth performance is pineapple intercrop with Hevea.benthamiana and the poor growth performance is pineapple intercrop with RRIM 600. There are certain characteristic of this species that make the effect toward the pineapples differ from each other Based on result, the conclusion can be make is there are rubber species that affect the growth performance of pineapple tree.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple growth performance differed significantly across intercropping with seven rubber species.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse1
Treatment
intercrop with seven rubber speciese1
Outcome
pineapple growth performancee1
Setting
Jelebu Negeri Sembilane0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data is collected at Jelebu Negeri Sembilan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–636 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result is show that there a significant different with all the parameter on pineapple growth performance when intercrop with seven rubber species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple intercropped with Hevea.benthamiana had the highest growth performance.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse2
Treatment
intercrop with Hevea.benthamianae2
Outcome
growth performancee2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The highest growth performance is pineapple intercrop with Hevea.benthamiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple intercropped with RRIM 600 had poor growth performance.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse3
Treatment
intercrop with RRIM 600e3
Outcome
growth performancee3
Direction
poore3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the poor growth performance is pineapple intercrop with RRIM 600”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–979 · show in text ↑

intercropping · growth · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.