Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pineapple intercropped with RRIM 600 had poor growth performance.

A claim from A case study in the growth performance of pineapple (MD2) intercropping with different rubber species / Nik Mohamad Amershazwan Nik Azlan · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple intercropped with RRIM 600 had poor growth performance.

Taxon
pineappleAnanas comosuse3
Treatment
intercrop with RRIM 600e3
Outcome
growth performancee3
Direction
poore3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the poor growth performance is pineapple intercrop with RRIM 600”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–979

Title

A case study in the growth performance of pineapple (MD2) intercropping with different rubber species / Nik Mohamad Amershazwan Nik Azlan

Nik Azlan; Nik Mohamad Amershazwan 2018

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e4137407d985b94f31594b4177ba9c31b7e695ac8c075cb5ff5df852388a4d10 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

intercropping · growth · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
    Intercropping did not significantly influence pineapple growth indices.

    Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Pineapple in a Pineapple-Pepper-Cowpea Intercropping System · 2016

    Same direction

  2. no effect
    Intercrops and mulch did not significantly affect papaya and pineapple growth parameters.

    Performance of intercropping in pre-bearing mango orchards under drip irrigation in a degraded land · 2018

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.