Paper · 2018

Performance of pearl millet hybrids and their parents under variable environmental conditions

Sonali Sharma; Anil Kumar

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at the research farm of Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India during kharif 2016 and 2017 to study the performance of pearl millet hybrids and their parents under variable environmental conditions. At each cropping season, the trials were conducted under rainfed and irrigated conditions with six pearl millet hybrids (HHB 67 (Improved), HHB 197, HHB 272, HHB 226, HHB 234 and HHB 223) and their parental lines i.e., B-Lines (ICMB 843-22, ICMB 97111, HMS 47 B, ICMB 843-22, HMS 7B and ICMB 94555) and R-Lines (H-77/833-2-202, HBL-11, AC 04/13, HBL-11, H-77/833-2- 202 and HBL-11). Although pearl millet is a rainfed crop but positive results of irrigation was observed. Results showed that the yield attributing characters and yield was higher under irrigated environment than rainfed condition. The grain yield, stover yield, effective tillers, total tillers were higer in HHB 197 under rainfed situation and HHB 223 under irrigated situation. BLines of these hybrids also performed better under different environments but the R-Line AC 04/13 performed better and this line in further can be used in crop improvement programme.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributing characters and yield of pearl millet were higher under irrigated environment than under rainfed condition.

Taxon
pearl millet hybridst0
Treatment
irrigated environmente1
Outcome
yield attributing characters and yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
rainfed conditione1

Verbatim

t0

“pearl millet hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–35 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield attributing characters and yield was higher under irrigated environment than rainfed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–854 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and stover yield were higher in HHB 197 under rainfed situation.

Taxon
pearl millet hybridst0
Material
HHB 197e2
Outcome
grain yield, stover yielde2
Direction
higere2
Setting
rainfed situatione2

Verbatim

t0

“pearl millet hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–35 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield, stover yield, effective tillers, total tillers were higer in HHB 197 under rainfed situation and HHB 223 under irrigated situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1003 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective tillers and total tillers were higher in HHB 197 under rainfed situation.

Taxon
pearl millet hybridst0
Material
HHB 197e2
Outcome
effective tillers, total tillerse2
Direction
higere2
Setting
rainfed situatione2

Verbatim

t0

“pearl millet hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–35 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield, stover yield, effective tillers, total tillers were higer in HHB 197 under rainfed situation and HHB 223 under irrigated situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1003 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and stover yield were higher in HHB 223 under irrigated situation.

Taxon
pearl millet hybridst0
Material
HHB 223e2
Outcome
grain yield, stover yielde2
Direction
higere2
Setting
irrigated situatione2

Verbatim

t0

“pearl millet hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–35 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield, stover yield, effective tillers, total tillers were higer in HHB 197 under rainfed situation and HHB 223 under irrigated situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1003 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective tillers and total tillers were higher in HHB 223 under irrigated situation.

Taxon
pearl millet hybridst0
Material
HHB 223e2
Outcome
effective tillers, total tillerse2
Direction
higere2
Setting
irrigated situatione2

Verbatim

t0

“pearl millet hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–35 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield, stover yield, effective tillers, total tillers were higer in HHB 197 under rainfed situation and HHB 223 under irrigated situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1003 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The R-line AC 04/13 performed better than the other lines across different environments.

Taxon
pearl millet hybridst0
Material
AC 04/13e3
Outcome
performed bettere3
Direction
performed bettere3
Setting
different environmentse3

Verbatim

t0

“pearl millet hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–35 · show in text ↑
e3

“BLines of these hybrids also performed better under different environments but the R-Line AC 04/13 performed better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1120 · show in text ↑

climate site · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.