Paper · 2019 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Maximizing pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) productivity and profitability using site specific nutrient management strategy

SANDEEP SINGH; MANOJ PANDEY; VINAY SINGH

20
claims
47
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during kharif 2014 and 2015 at farmers’ field at Panwari village of Agra district (Uttar Pradesh) to study the effect of site specific nutrient management (SSNM) on productivity, profitability and uptake of nutrients by pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R.Br.]. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with 10 treatments and three replications. Results, pooled over two years, indicated that the SSNM led to significant increase in grain and stover yield of pearl millet as compared to the state recommended NPK fertilizers and farmers’ practice. SSNM increased the grain yield of pearl millet by 30.6 and 42.2% over state recommended NPK fertilizers and farmer practice, respectively. The maximum net profits of Rupees 45209/ha with a B:C ratio of 2.71 was obtained from pearl millet under SSNM. The minimum net profits (Rupees 29818/ha) and B:C ratio (2.53) were recorded under farmer practice. Omission of P, K, S and Zn nutrients caused grain yield reductions by 22.4% , 24.0% , 7.4% and 7.0% over SSNM, respectively. The uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn by pearl millet grain and stover in SSNM was higher than that of the farmer’s practice. The protein content and protein yield also improved with various treatments over farmers’ practice and the maximum values for both were recorded under SSNM. The fertility status of soil increased with various treatments and the maximum values of organic carbon (4.0 g/kg), available N (204.5 kg/ha), P (16 kg/ha), K (144 kg/ha), S (22.4 kg/ha) and Zn (0.61 mg/kg) were recorded with 120 kg N+60 kg P2O5 + 90 kg K2O+ 20 kg S + 4 kg Zn/ha over other treatments. Omission of S and Zn caused a reduction in available S and Zn status over their initial values.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM significantly increased grain and stover yield of pearl millet compared with the state recommended NPK fertilizers (pooled over two years).

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
grain and stover yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
state recommended NPK fertilizerse0
Setting
Panwari village of Agra district (Uttar Pradesh)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the SSNM led to significant increase in grain and stover yield of pearl millet as compared to the state recommended NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–572 · show in text ↑
e1

“Panwari village of Agra district (Uttar Pradesh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased the grain yield of pearl millet by 30.6% over state recommended NPK fertilizers.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.6e0
Comparator
state recommended NPK fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSNM increased the grain yield of pearl millet by 30.6 and 42.2% over state recommended NPK fertilizers and farmer practice, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased the grain yield of pearl millet by 42.2% over farmer practice.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.2%e0
Comparator
farmer practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSNM increased the grain yield of pearl millet by 30.6 and 42.2% over state recommended NPK fertilizers and farmer practice, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–733 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum net profit in pearl millet, Rupees 45209/ha, was obtained under SSNM.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
net profitse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rupees 45209/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum net profits of Rupees 45209/ha with a B:C ratio of 2.71 was obtained from pearl millet under SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum benefit-cost ratio in pearl millet, 2.71, was obtained under SSNM.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.71e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum net profits of Rupees 45209/ha with a B:C ratio of 2.71 was obtained from pearl millet under SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum net profit, Rupees 29818/ha, was recorded under farmer practice.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
farmer practicee0
Outcome
net profitse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
Rupees 29818/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum net profits (Rupees 29818/ha) and B:C ratio (2.53) were recorded under farmer practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum benefit-cost ratio, 2.53, was recorded under farmer practice.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
farmer practicee0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
2.53e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum net profits (Rupees 29818/ha) and B:C ratio (2.53) were recorded under farmer practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting P caused a grain yield reduction of 22.4% relative to SSNM in pearl millet.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Omission of P, K, S and Zn nutrientse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
22.4%e0
Comparator
SSNMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of P, K, S and Zn nutrients caused grain yield reductions by 22.4% , 24.0% , 7.4% and 7.0% over SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting K caused a grain yield reduction of 24.0% relative to SSNM in pearl millet.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Omission of P, K, S and Zn nutrientse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
24.0%e0
Comparator
SSNMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of P, K, S and Zn nutrients caused grain yield reductions by 22.4% , 24.0% , 7.4% and 7.0% over SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting S caused a grain yield reduction of 7.4% relative to SSNM in pearl millet.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Omission of P, K, S and Zn nutrientse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
7.4%e0
Comparator
SSNMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of P, K, S and Zn nutrients caused grain yield reductions by 22.4% , 24.0% , 7.4% and 7.0% over SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting Zn caused a grain yield reduction of 7.0% relative to SSNM in pearl millet.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Omission of P, K, S and Zn nutrientse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
7.0%e0
Comparator
SSNMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of P, K, S and Zn nutrients caused grain yield reductions by 22.4% , 24.0% , 7.4% and 7.0% over SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn by pearl millet grain and stover was higher under SSNM than under farmer practice.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Organ / stage
grain and stovere0
Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
uptake of N, P, K, S and Zne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
farmer’s practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn by pearl millet grain and stover in SSNM was higher than that of the farmer’s practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content and protein yield of pearl millet improved with various treatments over farmers practice, with maximum values for both under SSNM.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
protein content and protein yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content and protein yield also improved with various treatments over farmers’ practice and the maximum values for both were recorded under SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting S and Zn reduced available soil S and Zn status relative to their initial values.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Omission of S and Zne0
Outcome
available S and Zn statuse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of S and Zn caused a reduction in available S and Zn status over their initial values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1745 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon was maximum (4.0 g/kg) with 120 kg N + 60 kg P2O5 + 90 kg K2O + 20 kg S + 4 kg Zn/ha over other treatments.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120 kg N+60 kg P2O5e1
Outcome
organic carbone0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.0 g/kge0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum values of organic carbon (4.0 g/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1462 · show in text ↑
e1

“120 kg N+60 kg P2O5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1593 · show in text ↑
e2

“over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil N was highest (204.5 kg/ha) with the full NPK+S+Zn treatment over other treatments.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120 kg N+60 kg P2O5e1
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
204.5 kg/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available N (204.5 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1489 · show in text ↑
e1

“120 kg N+60 kg P2O5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1593 · show in text ↑
e2

“over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil P was highest (16 kg/ha) with the full NPK+S+Zn treatment over other treatments.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120 kg N+60 kg P2O5e1
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
16 kg/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P (16 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1503 · show in text ↑
e1

“120 kg N+60 kg P2O5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1593 · show in text ↑
e2

“over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil K was highest (144 kg/ha) with the full NPK+S+Zn treatment over other treatments.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120 kg N+60 kg P2O5e1
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
144 kg/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K (144 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1518 · show in text ↑
e1

“120 kg N+60 kg P2O5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1593 · show in text ↑
e2

“over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil S was highest (22.4 kg/ha) with the full NPK+S+Zn treatment over other treatments.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120 kg N+60 kg P2O5e1
Outcome
Se0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
22.4 kg/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S (22.4 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1534 · show in text ↑
e1

“120 kg N+60 kg P2O5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1593 · show in text ↑
e2

“over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil Zn was highest (0.61 mg/kg) with the full NPK+S+Zn treatment over other treatments.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
120 kg N+60 kg P2O5e1
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
0.61 mg/kge0
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn (0.61 mg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1554 · show in text ↑
e1

“120 kg N+60 kg P2O5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1593 · show in text ↑
e2

“over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 26 positive, 3 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

potassium · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

climate site · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

climate site · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 65 positive, 1 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.