Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Protein content and protein yield of pearl millet improved with various treatments over farmers practice, with maximum values for both under SSNM.

A claim from Maximizing pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) productivity and profitability using site specific nutrient management strategy · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content and protein yield of pearl millet improved with various treatments over farmers practice, with maximum values for both under SSNM.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
protein content and protein yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content and protein yield also improved with various treatments over farmers’ practice and the maximum values for both were recorded under SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1346
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23

Title

Maximizing pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) productivity and profitability using site specific nutrient management strategy

SANDEEP SINGH; MANOJ PANDEY; VINAY SINGH The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2019. doi:10.56093/ijas.v89i1.86132

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-5fa134ec22fcecfbae6e0409edd033ab750166d33e04f9e427506c60d0f65c26 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: protein · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

43 papers: 43 positive, 0 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.