Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SSNM increased the grain yield of pearl millet by 42.2% over farmer practice.

A claim from Maximizing pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) productivity and profitability using site specific nutrient management strategy · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased the grain yield of pearl millet by 42.2% over farmer practice.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.2%e0
Comparator
farmer practicee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSNM increased the grain yield of pearl millet by 30.6 and 42.2% over state recommended NPK fertilizers and farmer practice, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–733

Title

Maximizing pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) productivity and profitability using site specific nutrient management strategy

SANDEEP SINGH; MANOJ PANDEY; VINAY SINGH The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2019. doi:10.56093/ijas.v89i1.86132

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-3a8f0cd6dc16669d02cc1f26d9e4d404abde8059140e5efcb7a4e03026906abb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

climate site · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

250 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.