Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed management in organically grown scented rice

Sachin Aske; B.M. Maurya; Jugnahake Monika; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment on evaluation of weed management practices in scented rice under organic production system was conducted during 2017–18 at All India Coordinated Research Project on Farming System, College of Agriculture, Rewa (M.P.). Fimbristylis dichotoma was the most dominating weed in rice field followed by Jussia suffurusticosa. Incorporation of mustard oil cake at 5 t/ha along with one hand weeding gave maximum weed control efficiency (68%). Growth and development of rice was better with incorporation of mustard oil cake 15 days before sowing 5 t/ha + 1 hand weeding (HW) followed by two HW at 20 and 40 days after transplanting (DAT) and locally available weed mulch Saccharum spontaneam at 3 t/ha + 1 hand weeding. These treatments gave 34 to 56% higher grain yield as compared to farmer's practice of weed control as mulching with mango leaves. Net profit of ‘ 62061/ha was maximum in mulching with locally available weeds + 1 hand weeding followed by ‘ 56695/ha in two HW at 20 and 40 DAT.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fimbristylis dichotoma was the most dominating weed in the scented rice field.

Taxon
scented ricet0
Interactor
Fimbristylis dichotomaFimbristylis dichotomae1weed
Outcome
dominating weede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fimbristylis dichotoma
Fimbristylis dichotoma · InteractorForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fimbristylis dichotoma was the most dominating weed in rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in organically grown scented rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard oil cake at 5 t/ha with one hand weeding gave the maximum weed control efficiency of 68%.

Taxon
scented ricet0
Treatment
Incorporation of mustard oil cake at 5 t/ha along with one hand weedinge2
Outcome
weed control efficiencye2
Direction
maximume2
Value
68%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“Incorporation of mustard oil cake at 5 t/ha along with one hand weeding gave maximum weed control efficiency (68%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in organically grown scented rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice growth and development were better with mustard oil cake 15 days before sowing at 5 t/ha plus one hand weeding.

Treatment
incorporation of mustard oil cake 15 days before sowing 5 t/ha + 1 hand weeding (HW)e3
Outcome
Growth and developmente3
Direction
bettere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Growth and development of rice was better with incorporation of mustard oil cake 15 days before sowing 5 t/ha + 1 hand weeding (HW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in organically grown scented rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice growth and development were better with locally available weed mulch of Saccharum spontaneam at 3 t/ha plus one hand weeding.

Treatment
locally available weed mulch Saccharum spontaneam at 3 t/ha + 1 hand weedinge4
Outcome
Growth and developmente4
Direction
bettere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Growth and development of rice was better with incorporation of mustard oil cake 15 days before sowing 5 t/ha + 1 hand weeding (HW) followed by two HW at 20 and 40 days after transplanting (DAT) and locally available weed mulch Saccharum spontaneam at 3 t/ha + 1 hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in organically grown scented rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments gave 34 to 56% higher grain yield than the farmer practice of mango-leaf mulching.

Taxon
scented ricet0
Treatment
These treatmentse5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
34 to 56%e5
Comparator
farmer's practice of weed control as mulching with mango leavese5

Verbatim

e5

“These treatments gave 34 to 56% higher grain yield as compared to farmer's practice of weed control as mulching with mango leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in organically grown scented rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching with locally available weeds plus one hand weeding gave the maximum net profit, Rs 62061/ha.

Taxon
scented ricet0
Treatment
mulching with locally available weeds + 1 hand weedinge6
Outcome
Net profite6
Direction
maximume6
Value
62061/hae6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6

“Net profit of ‘ 62061/ha was maximum in mulching with locally available weeds + 1 hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in organically grown scented rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAT gave a net profit of Rs 56695/ha.

Taxon
scented ricet0
Treatment
two HW at 20 and 40 DATe7
Outcome
Net profite6
Value
56695/hae7

Verbatim

e6

“Net profit of ‘ 62061/ha was maximum in mulching with locally available weeds + 1 hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–956 · show in text ↑
e7

“followed by ‘ 56695/ha in two HW at 20 and 40 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in organically grown scented rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–49 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

123 papers: 92 positive, 31 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

mulching · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 34 positive, 12 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

botanical · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

211 papers: 133 positive, 78 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

207 papers more in this group

See all 211 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.