Paper · 2019 · PLoS ONE

Moisture adsorption isotherms and quality of seeds stored in conventional packaging materials and hermetic Super Bag

Muhammad Amir Bakhtavar; Irfan Afzal; Shahzad Maqsood Ahmed Basra

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
78
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Seed moisture content (SMC) is an important attribute to seed quality. Maintaining seed dryness throughout supply chain (The Dry Chain) prevents seed germination and quality losses. Ambient relative humidity (RH) and temperature affect seed moisture and thereof seed moisture isotherm. Present study was conducted to compare the moisture adsorption isotherms of wheat, maize, cotton and quinoa seeds packed in hermetic Super Bag and traditional packaging materials including paper, polypropylene (PP), jute and cloth bags. Seeds were incubated at 60, 70, 80 and 90% static RH. Nearly straight line moisture isotherms for all crop seeds were obtained in Super Bag. Seed moisture contents increased in traditional packaging materials with increasing RH. At higher level of RH, moisture contents increased slightly (1-2%) in Super Bag, whereas this increase was much higher in traditional packaging materials (≈9% higher than original SMC at 90% RH). In second study, seeds were dried to 8 and 14% initial seed moisture contents using zeolite drying beads and were stored in hermetic and conventional packaging materials for a period of 18 months. For all crop seeds, germination was severely affected in all packaging materials both at 8 and 14% initial SMC except storage in Super Bag at 8% SMC. Wheat seed stored in Super Bag at 8% SMC almost maintained initial germination while germination of cotton, maize and quinoa seeds declined 7%, 14% and 30% respectively in Super Bag at 8% SMC. Seed storage in Super Bag can help to prevent the significant increase in seed moisture at higher RH as is evident from moisture isotherm study, thus helps to preserve quality of maize, wheat, cotton and quinoa seeds by maintaining The Dry Chain throughout the storage period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super Bag gave nearly straight moisture isotherms for all crop seeds.

Treatment
Super Bage0
Outcome
Nearly straight line moisture isothermse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Nearly straight line moisture isotherms for all crop seeds were obtained in Super Bag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–662 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed moisture increased in traditional packaging as relative humidity increased.

Treatment
traditional packaging materialse0
Outcome
Seed moisture contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
increasing RHe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Seed moisture contents increased in traditional packaging materials with increasing RH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high humidity, seed moisture rose slightly by 1-2% in Super Bag.

Treatment
Super Bage0
Outcome
moisture contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1-2%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“At higher level of RH, moisture contents increased slightly (1-2%) in Super Bag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90% humidity, traditional bags increased seed moisture by about 9% over original content.

Treatment
traditional packaging materialse0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
highere0
Value
≈9%e0
Comparator
original SMCe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“this increase was much higher in traditional packaging materials (≈9% higher than original SMC at 90% RH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super Bag at 8% initial moisture largely maintained wheat seed germination.

Treatment
Super Bag at 8% SMCe0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
almost maintainede0
Comparator
initial germinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat seed stored in Super Bag at 8% SMC almost maintained initial germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton germination declined 7% in Super Bag at 8% initial moisture.

Treatment
Super Bag at 8% SMCe0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
declinede0
Value
7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination of cotton, maize and quinoa seeds declined 7%, 14% and 30% respectively in Super Bag at 8% SMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize germination declined 14% in Super Bag at 8% initial moisture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Super Bag at 8% SMCe0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
declinede0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination of cotton, maize and quinoa seeds declined 7%, 14% and 30% respectively in Super Bag at 8% SMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quinoa germination declined 30% in Super Bag at 8% initial moisture.

Treatment
Super Bag at 8% SMCe0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
declinede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination of cotton, maize and quinoa seeds declined 7%, 14% and 30% respectively in Super Bag at 8% SMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination was severely affected in other packaging and initial moisture conditions.

Outcome
germinatione0
Qualifier
in all packaging materials both at 8 and 14% initial SMC except storage in Super Bag at 8% SMCe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“For all crop seeds, germination was severely affected in all packaging materials both at 8 and 14% initial SMC except storage in Super Bag at 8% SMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1293 · show in text ↑

soil water · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

soil water · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

soil water · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 19 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.