Paper · 2019 · Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences

Extending the Postharvest Quality of Peach Fruits by Salicylic Acid and MAP Treatments

Ferhan Küçükbasmacı Sabır; Sevil Unal; Mays Talal Kadhim Maadheedi; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Postharvest salicylic acid (SA) treatments can decrease the fungal decay of horticultural crops by affecting the ethylene biosynthesis and inducing the systemic resistance during cold storage. In the present study, effects of SA and modified atmosphere packages (MAP) on the postharvest quality maintenance of fruits of peach cv ‘J. H. Hale’ were investigated. After harvest at commercial maturity, half lot of each of the fruits was subjected to 1 mM SA for 5 min and was packed with or without MAP. The remaining lot was not subjected to SA but was also stored with or without MAP. All the fruits were stored at 1°C and 90% relative humidity for 60 d. Weight loss, color of flesh and skin, firmness, total soluble solid, titratable acidity, total phenolic and total antioxidant analyses were performed with 15 d intervals to compare the effectiveness of treatments. SA treatment had positive influences on the of postharvest quality maintenance of the fruits. In p P articular ly , the combined use of SA and MAP was more effective than their individual use i o n maintaining the firmness of the fruits , delaying the biochemical changes in the with flesh and alterations in the skin color than their single use .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid treatment had positive effects on postharvest quality maintenance of peach fruit.

Treatment
SA treatmente1
Outcome
postharvest quality maintenancee1
Direction
positive influencese1
Comparator
not subjected to SAe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SA treatment had positive influences on the of postharvest quality maintenance of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–960 · show in text ↑
e2

“The remaining lot was not subjected to SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined SA and MAP was more effective than their individual use in maintaining peach fruit firmness.

Treatment
combined use of SA and MAPe3
Outcome
firmnesse3
Direction
more effectivee3
Comparator
their individual usee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the combined use of SA and MAP was more effective than their individual use i o n maintaining the firmness of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined SA and MAP delayed biochemical changes in peach flesh more than single use.

Treatment
combined use of SA and MAPe3
Outcome
biochemical changese4
Direction
delayinge4
Comparator
their single usee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the combined use of SA and MAP was more effective than their individual use i o n maintaining the firmness of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1104 · show in text ↑
e4

“delaying the biochemical changes in the with flesh and alterations in the skin color than their single use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined SA and MAP altered peach skin colour less than single use.

Treatment
combined use of SA and MAPe3
Outcome
alterations in the skin colore4
Direction
more effectivee3
Comparator
their single usee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the combined use of SA and MAP was more effective than their individual use i o n maintaining the firmness of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1104 · show in text ↑
e4

“delaying the biochemical changes in the with flesh and alterations in the skin color than their single use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.