Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Productivity and Quality of Greengram as Influenced by Potassium and Zinc Nutrition

Mohammad Javid Rahimi; Y. Reddi Ramu; N. Sunitha; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2018 at S.V. Agricultural College, dryland farm, Tirupati to test the effect of potassium and zinc on yield and quality of greengram with eight nutrient management practices viz., Control (T1), application of Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF) (20-50-0 kg N, P2O5 and K2O ha-1) (T2), soil application of 40 kg K2O ha-1 along with RDF (T3 ) 25 kg of ZnSO4 ha-1 along with RDF (T4) 40 kg K2O + 25 kg of ZnSO4 ha-1 along with RDF (T5) Foliar application of either KNO3 @ 1.0 % (T6) ZnSO4 @ 0.2 % (T7) along with RDF and KNO3 @ 1.0 % and ZnSO4 @ 0.2 % at flower bud initiation along with RDF(T8) at flower bud initiation. Potassium and zinc were applied basally in the form of Muriate of Potash, ZnSO4 and foliar application of potassium and zinc in the form of KNO3 @ 1.0 % and ZnSO4 @ 0.2 % at flower bud initiation. The highest seed yield, haulm yield and harvest index of greengram was recorded with foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8), which was however comparable with soil application of 40 kg K2O + 25 kg of ZnSO4 ha-1 along with RDF (T5) and significantly superior over the rest of the nutrient management practices tried. Foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8) recorded significantly higher protein and zinc content in the grain, which was however comparable with foliar application of 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T7) significantly superior over the rest of the nutrient management practices tried.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation with RDF (T8) gave the highest seed yield, haulm yield and harvest index of greengram, significantly superior to the other practices.

Treatment
foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8)e0
Outcome
seed yield, haulm yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the rest of the nutrient management practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield, haulm yield and harvest index of greengram was recorded with foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was however comparable with soil application of 40 kg K2O + 25 kg of ZnSO4 ha-1 along with RDF (T5) and significantly superior over the rest of the nutrient management practices tried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T8 yields were comparable with soil application of 40 kg K2O + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 along with RDF (T5).

Treatment
foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8)e0
Outcome
seed yield, haulm yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
comparablee1
Comparator
soil application of 40 kg K2O + 25 kg of ZnSO4 ha-1 along with RDF (T5)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed yield, haulm yield and harvest index of greengram was recorded with foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1044 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was however comparable with soil application of 40 kg K2O + 25 kg of ZnSO4 ha-1 along with RDF (T5) and significantly superior over the rest of the nutrient management practices tried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation with RDF (T8) gave significantly higher protein and zinc content in the grain, superior to the other practices.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8)e0
Outcome
protein and zinc content in the graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the rest of the nutrient management practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8) recorded significantly higher protein and zinc content in the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was however comparable with foliar application of 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T7) significantly superior over the rest of the nutrient management practices tried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T8 protein and zinc content in grain was comparable with foliar 0.2% ZnSO4 with RDF (T7).

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8)e0
Outcome
protein and zinc content in the graine0
Direction
comparablee1
Comparator
foliar application of 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T7)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of 1% KNO3 + 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T8) recorded significantly higher protein and zinc content in the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was however comparable with foliar application of 0.2% ZnSO4 at flower bud initiation stage along with RDF (T7) significantly superior over the rest of the nutrient management practices tried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 · show in text ↑

potassium nitrate · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium nitrate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

application · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

30 papers: 30 positive, 0 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.