Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Micronutrient Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Green Gram Growing Iron and Zinc Deficient Soils of Renapur Tahsil, Latur

A. R. Tribhuwan; A. N. Puri; B. R. Chavan

15
claims
45
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Effect of micronutrient application in green gram growing iron and zinc deficient soils of Renapur Tahsil, Latur” during Kharif season of the year, 2022-2023 at A Field experiment was conducted at farmers field At. Post-Dawangaon Tq-Renapur Dist- Latur. The experiment was layout in RBD with three replications and a recommended variety of green gram BM 2003-2 as a test crop along with ten treatments. Among the various treatments the application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7) significantly increased the growth parameters viz., highest plant height (52.19 cm at 60 DAS), number of branches(10.64 at 60 DAS), leaf area (540.67 cm2 plant-1at 60 DAS), dry matter content (9.54 g plant-1 at 60 DAS), total chlorophyll content (9.93 mg g-1 at 45 DAS) and number of nodules per plant (19.70), Yield parameters viz., higher number of pods plant-1(15.43), number of grains pod-1(11.88), seed yield kg ha-1 (1575.46) and straw yield kg ha-1 (1864.68) at harvest and the improvement in quality parameters i.e. test weight (35.23 g), protein content (22.37 %) and protein yield kg ha-1 (347.27) at harvest and was found at par with treatments T4 (RDF + S.A. Grade- I micro-nutrient @ 25 kg ha-1 + F.A. Grade- II micro-nutrient @ 0.5 % at 25 and 40 DAS) and treatment T2 (RDF + S.A. Grade- I micro-nutrient @ 25 kg ha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased plant height to 52.19 cm at 60 DAS.

Material
BM 2003-2e1
Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
52.19 cme0
Qualifier
at 60 DASe0
Setting
farmers field At. Post-Dawangaon Tq-Renapur Dist- Lature2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7) significantly increased the growth parameters viz., highest plant height (52.19 cm at 60 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–627 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“farmers field At. Post-Dawangaon Tq-Renapur Dist- Latur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased branch number to 10.64 at 60 DAS.

Material
BM 2003-2e1
Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
increasede2
Value
10.64e0
Qualifier
at 60 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of branches(10.64 at 60 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“the application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7) significantly increased the growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased leaf area to 540.67 cm2 plant-1 at 60 DAS.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasede2
Value
540.67 cm2 plant-1e0
Qualifier
at 60 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area (540.67 cm2 plant-1at 60 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“the application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7) significantly increased the growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased dry matter content to 9.54 g plant-1 at 60 DAS.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
dry matter contente0
Direction
increasede2
Value
9.54 g plant-1e0
Qualifier
at 60 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry matter content (9.54 g plant-1 at 60 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–752 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“the application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7) significantly increased the growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased total chlorophyll content to 9.93 mg g-1 at 45 DAS.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede2
Value
9.93 mg g-1e0
Qualifier
at 45 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll content (9.93 mg g-1 at 45 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“the application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7) significantly increased the growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased nodules per plant to 19.70.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
number of nodules per plante0
Direction
increasede2
Value
19.70e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of nodules per plant (19.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–843 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“the application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7) significantly increased the growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave higher pods per plant, 15.43.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.43e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield parameters viz., higher number of pods plant-1(15.43)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave higher grains per pod, 11.88.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
number of grains pod-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.88e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher number of pods plant-1(15.43), number of grains pod-1(11.88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave higher seed yield, reported as 1575.46 kg ha-1 at harvest.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
seed yield kg ha-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
1575.46e0
Qualifier
at harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher number of pods plant-1(15.43), number of grains pod-1(11.88), seed yield kg ha-1 (1575.46) and straw yield kg ha-1 (1864.68) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave higher straw yield, reported as 1864.68 kg ha-1 at harvest.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
straw yield kg ha-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
1864.68e0
Qualifier
at harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher number of pods plant-1(15.43), number of grains pod-1(11.88), seed yield kg ha-1 (1575.46) and straw yield kg ha-1 (1864.68) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 improved test weight to 35.23 g at harvest.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
35.23 ge0
Qualifier
at harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the improvement in quality parameters i.e. test weight (35.23 g), protein content (22.37 %) and protein yield kg ha-1 (347.27) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 improved protein content to 22.37 % at harvest.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
22.37 %e0
Qualifier
at harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the improvement in quality parameters i.e. test weight (35.23 g), protein content (22.37 %) and protein yield kg ha-1 (347.27) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 improved protein yield, reported as 347.27 kg ha-1 at harvest.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
protein yield kg ha-1e0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
347.27e0
Qualifier
at harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the improvement in quality parameters i.e. test weight (35.23 g), protein content (22.37 %) and protein yield kg ha-1 (347.27) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 performance was at par with T4.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
T4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was found at par with treatments T4 (RDF + S.A. Grade- I micro-nutrient @ 25 kg ha-1 + F.A. Grade- II micro-nutrient @ 0.5 % at 25 and 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 performance was at par with T2.

Treatment
RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)e2
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
T2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was found at par with treatments T4 (RDF + S.A. Grade- I micro-nutrient @ 25 kg ha-1 + F.A. Grade- II micro-nutrient @ 0.5 % at 25 and 40 DAS) and treatment T2 (RDF + S.A. Grade- I micro-nutrient @ 25 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1367 · show in text ↑
e1

“green gram BM 2003-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–396 · show in text ↑
e2

“RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 (T7)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–533 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc sulfate · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 17 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.