Paper · 2012 · Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika

Effect of sulphur an iron fertilization on productivity of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek]

Kamlesh K. Meena; S.M. Kumawat; S. L. Golada; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture Bikaner during kharif 2008 to study effect of sulphur and Iron fertilization on productivity of mungbean. Results showed significant increase in yield attributes viz; seed and straw yields were recorded under 40 kg S/ha as gypsum and gypsum +elemental sulphur (1:1) over control. Significantly improved seed yield and straw yield 19.58 and x percent over control, Also, the maximum net return Rs. 25291/ha and Rs. 24900/ha, respectively was recorded with 40kg S/ha asgypsum + elemental sulphur (1: 1) and 40 kg S/ha as gypsum source along with respective B: C ratio of 3.26 and 3.22 as against the minimum values observed under control treatment. Further, data revealed that 25 kg FeSO4/ha as basal application significantly increased yield attributes viz; seed and straw yields was significantly improved with both 25 kg FeSO4 as basal dose and foliar spray of 0.5% FeSO4 at 25 and 40 DAS in comparison to control. Application of 25 kg FeSO4/ha as basal dose, foliar spray of 0.5% FeSO4 and 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid solution at 25 and 40 DAS gave significantly higher protein content in seed and N, S and Iron concentration in seed and straw of mungbean compared to control. In mungbean, application of 25 kg FeSO4 as basal dose or 0.5% FeSO4 foliar spray at 25 and 40 DAS proved statistically at par and fetched the maximum net returns and B: C ratio while the minimum values noted under control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur treatments increased seed and straw yields.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
40 kg S/ha as gypsume0
Outcome
seed and straw yieldse0
Direction
overe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed and straw yields were recorded under 40 kg S/ha as gypsum and gypsum +elemental sulphur (1:1) over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–357 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum plus elemental sulphur yielded maximum net return of Rs. 25291/ha.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
40kg S/ha asgypsum + elemental sulphur (1: 1)e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 25291/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum net return Rs. 25291/ha and Rs. 24900/ha, respectively was recorded with 40kg S/ha asgypsum + elemental sulphur (1: 1) and 40 kg S/ha as gypsum source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal iron sulphate increased seed and straw yields.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
25 kg FeSO4/ha as basal applicatione0
Outcome
seed and straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25 kg FeSO4/ha as basal application significantly increased yield attributes viz; seed and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron treatments increased seed protein and nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
25 kg FeSO4/ha as basal dosee0
Outcome
protein content in seed and N, S and Iron concentration in seed and strawe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 25 kg FeSO4/ha as basal dose, foliar spray of 0.5% FeSO4 and 0.5% FeSO4 + 0.1% citric acid solution at 25 and 40 DAS gave significantly higher protein content in seed and N, S and Iron concentration in seed and straw of mungbean compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1258 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

lime · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.