Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economics of fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) varieties

KR Patel; MM Patel

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2016-17 at the College Farm, N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari to study the “Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, quality and economics of fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) varieties. Total ten treatment combinations comprising of two varieties viz., V1: JK kuber and V2: JK magnolia and five levels of integrated nutrient management i.e. F1 : 100% RDF (RDF: 120 : 60 : 60 NPK kg/ ha), F2 : 75% RDF+ 25% N through BC, F3 : 75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (Azotobacter + PSB + Potash solubilizing bacteria, 108 CFU/ml, 1.25 lit/ha each), F4 : 50% RDF + 50% N through BC and F5: 50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (Azotobacter + PSB + Potash solubilizing bacteria, 108 CFU/ml, 1.25 lit/ha each) were evaluated in factorial randomized block design with four replications. Significantly improved plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter accumulation per plant, root length and fresh foliage yield as well as N, P and K uptake by foliage was observed in JK magnolia (V2), while root weight, fresh root yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root were significantly higher in JK kuber (V­1). All the growth and yield parameters, fresh root yield, fresh foliage yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root and foliage were significantly influenced due to integrated nutrient management. All these parameters beared higher values with application of 50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5) followed by 75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3). Maximum net realization (₹ 108353 ha-1) and BCR (3.14) were registered under JK kuber (V1) followed by JK magnolia (V2) with net realization of ₹ 98119 ha-1 and BCR of 2.94. Whereas looking to the integrated nutrient management, application of 50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5) accrued the maximum net realization of ₹ 114897 ha-1 and BCR of 3.25 followed by application of 75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3) with net realization of ₹ 110147 ha-1 and BCR of 3.17d.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

JK magnolia had improved plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter accumulation per plant.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Material
JK magnolia (V2)e0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter accumulation per plante0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
JK kubere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly improved plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter accumulation per plant, root length and fresh foliage yield as well as N, P and K uptake by foliage was observed in JK magnolia (V2), while root weight, fresh root yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root were significantly higher in JK kuber (V­1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

JK magnolia had improved root length and fresh foliage yield.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Material
JK magnolia (V2)e0
Outcome
root length and fresh foliage yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
JK kubere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly improved plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter accumulation per plant, root length and fresh foliage yield as well as N, P and K uptake by foliage was observed in JK magnolia (V2), while root weight, fresh root yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root were significantly higher in JK kuber (V­1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

JK magnolia had improved N, P and K uptake by foliage.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Material
JK magnolia (V2)e0
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by foliagee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
JK kubere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly improved plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter accumulation per plant, root length and fresh foliage yield as well as N, P and K uptake by foliage was observed in JK magnolia (V2), while root weight, fresh root yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root were significantly higher in JK kuber (V­1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

JK kuber had higher root weight, fresh root yield and total fresh biomass yield.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Material
JK kubere0
Outcome
root weight, fresh root yield and total fresh biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
JK magnoliae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly improved plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter accumulation per plant, root length and fresh foliage yield as well as N, P and K uptake by foliage was observed in JK magnolia (V2), while root weight, fresh root yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root were significantly higher in JK kuber (V­1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

JK kuber had higher N, P and K uptake by root.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Material
JK kubere0
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by roote0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
JK magnoliae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly improved plant height, number of leaves per plant, dry matter accumulation per plant, root length and fresh foliage yield as well as N, P and K uptake by foliage was observed in JK magnolia (V2), while root weight, fresh root yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root were significantly higher in JK kuber (V­1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly influenced growth and yield parameters.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the growth and yield parameters, fresh root yield, fresh foliage yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root and foliage were significantly influenced due to integrated nutrient management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly influenced fresh root yield, fresh foliage yield and total fresh biomass yield.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
fresh root yield, fresh foliage yield and total fresh biomass yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the growth and yield parameters, fresh root yield, fresh foliage yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root and foliage were significantly influenced due to integrated nutrient management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly influenced N, P and K uptake by root and foliage.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by root and foliagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the growth and yield parameters, fresh root yield, fresh foliage yield and total fresh biomass yield as well as N, P and K uptake by root and foliage were significantly influenced due to integrated nutrient management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F5 produced higher measured growth, yield and nutrient uptake values, followed by F3.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5)e0
Outcome
All these parameterse0
Direction
higher valuese0
Comparator
75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All these parameters beared higher values with application of 50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5) followed by 75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1656 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JK kuber had maximum net realization among varieties.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Material
JK kuber (V1)e0
Outcome
net realizatione0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
₹ 108353 ha-1e0
Comparator
JK magnolia (V2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum net realization (₹ 108353 ha-1) and BCR (3.14) were registered under JK kuber (V1) followed by JK magnolia (V2) with net realization of ₹ 98119 ha-1 and BCR of 2.94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1830 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JK kuber had maximum BCR among varieties.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Material
JK kuber (V1)e0
Outcome
BCRe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
3.14e0
Comparator
JK magnolia (V2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum net realization (₹ 108353 ha-1) and BCR (3.14) were registered under JK kuber (V1) followed by JK magnolia (V2) with net realization of ₹ 98119 ha-1 and BCR of 2.94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1830 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5) yielded net realization of ₹ 114897 ha-1.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5)e0
Outcome
net realizatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
₹ 114897 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5) accrued the maximum net realization of ₹ 114897 ha-1 and BCR of 3.25 followed by application of 75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3) with net realization of ₹ 110147 ha-1 and BCR of 3.17d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–2150 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5) yielded BCR of 3.25.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5)e0
Outcome
BCRe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5) accrued the maximum net realization of ₹ 114897 ha-1 and BCR of 3.25 followed by application of 75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3) with net realization of ₹ 110147 ha-1 and BCR of 3.17d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–2150 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3) yielded net realization of ₹ 110147 ha-1.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3)e0
Outcome
net realizatione0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
₹ 110147 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5) accrued the maximum net realization of ₹ 114897 ha-1 and BCR of 3.25 followed by application of 75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3) with net realization of ₹ 110147 ha-1 and BCR of 3.17d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–2150 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3) yielded BCR of 3.17.

Taxon
fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3)e0
Outcome
BCRe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
3.17e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% RDF + 50% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F5) accrued the maximum net realization of ₹ 114897 ha-1 and BCR of 3.25 followed by application of 75% RDF + 25% N through BC + bio-fertilizer (F3) with net realization of ₹ 110147 ha-1 and BCR of 3.17d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–2150 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–125 · show in text ↑