Paper · 2019 · Agronomy Journal

Radiation Use Efficiency and Source‐Sink Changes of Super Hybrid Rice under Shade Stress during Grain‐Filling Stage

Ke Liu; Rui Yang; Jian Lu; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
67
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Super hybrid and regular hybrid varieties differed in their response to shade stress. Apparent exportation, apparent export ratio, and apparent transformation ratio significantly increased under shade stress. Maintaining higher radiation use efficiency and daily biomass production during grain‐filling stage may alleviate yield loss under shade stress. Continuous cloudy weather during grain‐filling stage has induced a significant rice ( Oryza sativa L.) yield loss. Field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of shade stress on radiation use efficiency (RUE), biomass production, and grain yield in two consecutive years by shading from flowering to maturity using super hybrid rice (SHR) varieties (Liangyoupeijiu, Yliangyou900) and an ordinary hybrid rice (OHR) variety (Shanyou63). The shading environment was created with shade nets above the rice canopy to reduce light intensity by 40%. Grain yield in SHR was reduced by 48.0% under shade stress, which was significantly higher than OHR (30.3%). Seed set percentage and grain weight were the key factors that determined grain yield under shade stress after flowering. Seed set percentage decreased by 50.1% in SHR and 23.8% in OHR. Under shade stress total dry weight in SHR decreased by 32.4 and 26.3% in ordinary rice varieties. Mean apparent exportation (AE), apparent export ratio (AER), and apparent transformation ratio (ATR) of these varieties increased by 46.1, 45.7, and 227% respectively, under shade stress across years. The difference in intercepted percentage between shade stress and non‐shaded conditions was insignificant, but RUE was significantly affected by shade stress. Radiation use efficiency in SHR decreased by 28.5 and 22.2% in OHR. There were very significantly ( P < 0.01) positive linear relationships between RUE, daily biomass production, and grain yield during grain‐filling stage. Our study suggests that higher RUE and daily biomass production during grain‐filling stage may alleviate yield loss under shade stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced super hybrid rice grain yield by 48.0%.

Material
SHRe0
Treatment
shade stresse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield in SHR was reduced by 48.0% under shade stress, which was significantly higher than OHR (30.3%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced ordinary hybrid rice grain yield by 30.3%.

Material
OHRe0
Treatment
shade stresse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield in SHR was reduced by 48.0% under shade stress, which was significantly higher than OHR (30.3%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced seed set percentage in super hybrid rice by 50.1%.

Material
SHRe0
Treatment
Shade Stresst0
Outcome
Seed set percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
50.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed set percentage decreased by 50.1% in SHR and 23.8% in OHR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Shade Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced seed set percentage in ordinary hybrid rice by 23.8%.

Material
OHRe0
Treatment
Shade Stresst0
Outcome
Seed set percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
23.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed set percentage decreased by 50.1% in SHR and 23.8% in OHR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Shade Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced total dry weight in super hybrid rice by 32.4%.

Material
SHRe0
Treatment
shade stresse0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
32.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under shade stress total dry weight in SHR decreased by 32.4 and 26.3% in ordinary rice varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced total dry weight in ordinary rice varieties by 26.3%.

Material
ordinary rice varietiese0
Treatment
shade stresse0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
26.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under shade stress total dry weight in SHR decreased by 32.4 and 26.3% in ordinary rice varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean apparent exportation increased by 46.1% under shade.

Treatment
shade stresse0
Outcome
apparent exportatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
46.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean apparent exportation (AE), apparent export ratio (AER), and apparent transformation ratio (ATR) of these varieties increased by 46.1, 45.7, and 227% respectively, under shade stress across years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean apparent export ratio increased by 45.7% under shade.

Treatment
shade stresse0
Outcome
apparent export ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean apparent exportation (AE), apparent export ratio (AER), and apparent transformation ratio (ATR) of these varieties increased by 46.1, 45.7, and 227% respectively, under shade stress across years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean apparent transformation ratio increased by 227% under shade.

Treatment
shade stresse0
Outcome
apparent transformation ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
227%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean apparent exportation (AE), apparent export ratio (AER), and apparent transformation ratio (ATR) of these varieties increased by 46.1, 45.7, and 227% respectively, under shade stress across years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade and nonshaded rice did not differ significantly in intercepted percentage.

Treatment
shade stresse0
Outcome
intercepted percentagee0
Comparator
non‐shaded conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in intercepted percentage between shade stress and non‐shaded conditions was insignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced radiation use efficiency in super hybrid rice by 28.5%.

Material
SHRe0
Treatment
shade stresse1
Outcome
Radiation use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
28.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Radiation use efficiency in SHR decreased by 28.5 and 22.2% in OHR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“RUE was significantly affected by shade stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced radiation use efficiency in ordinary hybrid rice by 22.2%.

Material
OHRe0
Treatment
Shade Stresst0
Outcome
Radiation use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
22.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Radiation use efficiency in SHR decreased by 28.5 and 22.2% in OHR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Shade Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“RUE was significantly affected by shade stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1677 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation use efficiency, daily biomass production and grain yield had very significant positive linear relationships during grain filling.

Organ / stage
grain‐filling stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
P < 0.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were very significantly ( P < 0.01) positive linear relationships between RUE, daily biomass production, and grain yield during grain‐filling stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1746–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Higher radiation use efficiency and daily biomass production during grain filling may alleviate shade-related yield loss.

Outcome
higher RUE and daily biomass production during grain‐filling stagee0
Qualifier
may alleviate yield loss under shade stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our study suggests that higher RUE and daily biomass production during grain‐filling stage may alleviate yield loss under shade stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

36 papers: 10 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

shade · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 15 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.