Claim · model-written summary
Shade and nonshaded rice did not differ significantly in intercepted percentage.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- shade stresse0
- Outcome
- intercepted percentagee0
- Comparator
- non‐shaded conditionse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The difference in intercepted percentage between shade stress and non‐shaded conditions was insignificant”
t0“Rice”
Title
Ke Liu; Rui Yang; Jian Lu; et al. Agronomy Journal 2019. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.10.0662
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Shade reduced super hybrid rice grain yield by 48.0%.
- Intervention effect Shade reduced ordinary hybrid rice grain yield by 30.3%.
- Intervention effect Shade reduced seed set percentage in super hybrid rice by 50.1%.
- Intervention effect Shade reduced seed set percentage in ordinary hybrid rice by 23.8%.
- Intervention effect Shade reduced total dry weight in super hybrid rice by 32.4%.
- Intervention effect Shade reduced total dry weight in ordinary rice varieties by 26.3%.
- Intervention effect Mean apparent exportation increased by 46.1% under shade.
- Intervention effect Mean apparent export ratio increased by 45.7% under shade.
- Intervention effect Mean apparent transformation ratio increased by 227% under shade.
- Intervention effect Shade reduced radiation use efficiency in super hybrid rice by 28.5%.
- Intervention effect Shade reduced radiation use efficiency in ordinary hybrid rice by 22.2%.
- Association Radiation use efficiency, daily biomass production and grain yield had very significant positive linear relationships during grain filling.
- Recommendation Higher radiation use efficiency and daily biomass production during grain filling may alleviate shade-related yield loss.