Paper · 2019 · PONTE International Scientific Researchs Journal

IMPROVEMENT OF ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI STRAINS FROM THE ALGERIAN SAHARA

Salim Azib; Hamid Cheloufi; Sara Attab; et al.

15
claims
35
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water deficit is one of the most important environmental stresses that adversely affect crop growth and production; and symbiotic bacteria have an important role in resistance to drought stress. Growth and nodulation of an alfalfa population originating from Ouargla oasis in association with six rhizobial strains (four local strains: E131, E222, O152 and O172, and two introduced strains: Sm1021 and Sm2011) exposed to three levels of water deficit (75%, 50% and 25% of field capacity) were assessed under greenhouse conditions. Phylogenetic analysis of concatenated sequences of glnII and recA showed that tested strains were closely related to reference strain S. meliloti USDA 1002T at similarity level of 97.76 and 98.07%, respectively. Increasing water stress gradually reduced plant growth and nodulation. At irrigation doses D2 and D3, growth was reduced respectively by 30% and 80% of plant height and by 31% and 72% of root length. Likewise, shoot and root dry weights decreased. The negative effect was more pronounced on shoots (39% and 75%) than on roots (no significant difference between control and D2, and between control and D3). Inoculation increased the capability of the plants to counteract the stress compared to the non-inoculated plants. So, the plants inoculated with Sm2011 and O152 strains increased shoot height, root length, shoot and root dry weights and formed the most efficient symbiotic couples compared to the other strains and non-inoculated control in all water stress levels. Inoculation under water stress was found to significantly affect nodule numbers of alfalfa. Under severe stress, a significantly higher nodule number was obtained with the O152 and Sm2011 strains. Under moderate stress, strains Sm2011, Sm1021 had the best nodulation. Our results show that combining alfalfa and rhizobial strains with superior water stress tolerance is an effective strategy to improve alfalfa productivity in drought affected areas. KEYWORDS: Water stress, alfalfa, Sinorhizobium meliloti, resistance, yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing water stress gradually reduced alfalfa plant growth and nodulation.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Increasing water stresse1
Outcome
plant growth and nodulatione1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing water stress gradually reduced plant growth and nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–812 · show in text ↑
e0

“Growth and nodulation of an alfalfa population originating from Ouargla oasis in association with six rhizobial strains (four local strains: E131, E222, O152 and O172, and two introduced strains: Sm1021 and Sm2011) exposed to three levels of water deficit (75%, 50% and 25% of field capacity) were assessed under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At irrigation doses D2 and D3, alfalfa plant height was reduced by 30% and 80%.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
irrigation doses D2 and D3e2
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
reducede2
Value
30% and 80%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“At irrigation doses D2 and D3, growth was reduced respectively by 30% and 80% of plant height and by 31% and 72% of root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At irrigation doses D2 and D3, alfalfa root length was reduced by 31% and 72%.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
irrigation doses D2 and D3e2
Outcome
root lengthe2
Direction
reducede2
Value
31% and 72%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“At irrigation doses D2 and D3, growth was reduced respectively by 30% and 80% of plant height and by 31% and 72% of root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under increasing water stress, shoot and root dry weights of alfalfa decreased.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Increasing water stresse1
Outcome
shoot and root dry weightse3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Likewise, shoot and root dry weights decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing water stress gradually reduced plant growth and nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The negative water-stress effect on alfalfa was more pronounced on shoots (39% and 75%) than on roots.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Increasing water stresse1
Outcome
shootse4
Direction
more pronouncede4
Value
39% and 75%e4
Comparator
rootse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The negative effect was more pronounced on shoots (39% and 75%) than on roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing water stress gradually reduced plant growth and nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate and severe water deficit (D2, D3), alfalfa roots showed no significant difference from control.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
irrigation doses D2 and D3e2
Outcome
rootse4
Direction
no significant differencee5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“no significant difference between control and D2, and between control and D3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1146 · show in text ↑
e2

“At irrigation doses D2 and D3, growth was reduced respectively by 30% and 80% of plant height and by 31% and 72% of root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–941 · show in text ↑
e4

“The negative effect was more pronounced on shoots (39% and 75%) than on roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased the capability of alfalfa to counteract water stress compared with non-inoculated plants.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Inoculatione6
Interactor
SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTISinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
capability of the plants to counteract the stresse6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Inoculation increased the capability of the plants to counteract the stress compared to the non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Sm2011 and O152 strains increased alfalfa shoot height and root length under all water stress levels.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculated with Sm2011 and O152 strainse7
Interactor
SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTISinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
shoot height, root lengthe7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
in all water stress levelse7
Comparator
non-inoculated controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the plants inoculated with Sm2011 and O152 strains increased shoot height, root length, shoot and root dry weights and formed the most efficient symbiotic couples compared to the other strains and non-inoculated control in all water stress levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Sm2011 and O152 strains increased alfalfa shoot and root dry weights under all water stress levels.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculated with Sm2011 and O152 strainse7
Interactor
SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTISinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root dry weightse7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
in all water stress levelse7
Comparator
non-inoculated controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the plants inoculated with Sm2011 and O152 strains increased shoot height, root length, shoot and root dry weights and formed the most efficient symbiotic couples compared to the other strains and non-inoculated control in all water stress levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Sm2011 and O152 strains formed the most efficient symbiotic couples with alfalfa.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculated with Sm2011 and O152 strainse7
Interactor
SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTISinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
symbiotic couplese7
Direction
most efficiente7
Comparator
the other strainse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the plants inoculated with Sm2011 and O152 strains increased shoot height, root length, shoot and root dry weights and formed the most efficient symbiotic couples compared to the other strains and non-inoculated control in all water stress levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe water stress, a significantly higher nodule number was obtained with O152 and Sm2011 strains.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
severe stresse0
Interactor
SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTISinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under severe stress, a significantly higher nodule number was obtained with the O152 and Sm2011 strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1711 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate water stress, strains Sm2011 and Sm1021 gave the best alfalfa nodulation.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
moderate stresse0
Interactor
SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTISinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under moderate stress, strains Sm2011, Sm1021 had the best nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1782 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation under water stress significantly affected alfalfa nodule numbers; direction not stated.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Inoculation under water stresse0
Interactor
SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTISinorhizobium melilotit0symbiont
Outcome
nodule numberse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation under water stress was found to significantly affect nodule numbers of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1606 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combining alfalfa with rhizobial strains of superior water stress tolerance is an effective strategy to improve alfalfa productivity in drought areas.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
combining alfalfa and rhizobial strains with superior water stress tolerancee0
Outcome
improve alfalfa productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining alfalfa and rhizobial strains with superior water stress tolerance is an effective strategy to improve alfalfa productivity in drought affected areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–1965 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested alfalfa rhizobial strains were closely related to reference S. meliloti USDA 1002T, at 97.76% and 98.07% similarity for glnII and recA.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Interactor
tested strainse0symbiont
Outcome
similarity levele0
Value
97.76 and 98.07%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phylogenetic analysis of concatenated sequences of glnII and recA showed that tested strains were closely related to reference strain S. meliloti USDA 1002T at similarity level of 97.76 and 98.07%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA GROWTH UNDER WATER STRESS BY INOCULATION WITH SINORHIZOBIUM MELILOTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–91 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

72 papers: 20 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

inoculation · Sinorhizobium meliloti · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

irrigation · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 22 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

drought · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

11 papers: 0 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.