Paper · 2019 · BMC Plant Biology

Interactive effects of nitrogen and potassium on photosynthesis and photosynthetic nitrogen allocation of rice leaves

Wenfeng Hou; Merle Tränkner; Jianwei Lu; et al.

14
claims
33
verbatim quotes
111
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) are two important mineral nutrients in regulating leaf photosynthesis. Studying the interactive effects of N and K on regulating N allocation and photosynthesis (P n ) of rice leaves will be of great significance for further increasing leaf P n , photosynthetic N use efficiency (PNUE) and grain yield. We measured the gas exchange of rice leaves in a field experiment and tested different kinds of leaf N based on N morphology and function, and calculated the interactive effects of N and K on N allocation and the PNUE. Compared with N0 (0 kg N ha − 1 ) and K0 (0 kg K 2 O ha − 1 ) treatments, the P n was increased by 17.1 and 12.2% with the supply of N and K. Compared with N0K0 (0 kg N and 0 kg K 2 O ha − 1 ), N0K120 (0 kg N and 120 kg K 2 O ha − 1 ) and N0K180 (0 kg N and 180 kg K 2 O ha − 1 ), N supply increased the absolute content of photosynthetic N (N psn ) by 15.1, 15.5 and 10.5% on average, and the storage N (N store ) was increased by 32.7, 64.9 and 72.7% on average. The relative content of N psn was decreased by 5.6, 12.1 and 14.5%, while that of N store was increased by 8.7, 27.8 and 33.8%. Supply of K promoted the transformation of N store to N psn despite the leaf N content (N a ) was indeed decreased. Compared with N0K0, N180K0 (180 kg N and 0 kg K 2 O ha − 1 ) and N270K0 (270 kg N and 0 kg K 2 O ha − 1 ), K supply increased the relative content of N psn by 17.7, 8.8 and 7.3%, and decreased the relative content of N store by 24.2, 11.4 and 8.7% respectively. This study indicated the mechanism that K supply decreased the N a but increased the N psn content and then increased leaf P n and PNUE from a new viewpoint of leaf N allocation. The supply of K promoted the transformation of N store to N psn and increased the PNUE. The decreased N store mainly resulted from the decrease of non-protein N. Combined use of N and K could optimize leaf N allocation and maintain a high leaf N psn content and PNUE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supply raised rice leaf photosynthesis by 17.1%.

Treatment
supply of Ne0
Outcome
P ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.1e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with N0 (0 kg N ha − 1 ) and K0 (0 kg K 2 O ha − 1 ) treatments, the P n was increased by 17.1 and 12.2% with the supply of N and K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium supply raised rice leaf photosynthesis by 12.2%.

Treatment
supply of N and Ke0
Outcome
P ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.2%e0
Comparator
K0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with N0 (0 kg N ha − 1 ) and K0 (0 kg K 2 O ha − 1 ) treatments, the P n was increased by 17.1 and 12.2% with the supply of N and K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N supply increased absolute photosynthetic N by 15.1%, 15.5% and 10.5% across listed K backgrounds.

Treatment
N supplye0
Outcome
absolute content of photosynthetic N (N psn )e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.1, 15.5 and 10.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N supply increased the absolute content of photosynthetic N (N psn ) by 15.1, 15.5 and 10.5% on average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N supply increased storage N by 32.7%, 64.9% and 72.7%.

Treatment
N supplyt1
Outcome
storage N (N store )e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32.7, 64.9 and 72.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the storage N (N store ) was increased by 32.7, 64.9 and 72.7% on average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“N supply increased the absolute content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N supply decreased relative photosynthetic N by 5.6%, 12.1% and 14.5%.

Treatment
N supplyt1
Outcome
relative content of N psne0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.6, 12.1 and 14.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative content of N psn was decreased by 5.6, 12.1 and 14.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“N supply increased the absolute content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N supply increased relative storage N by 8.7%, 27.8% and 33.8%.

Treatment
N supplyt1
Outcome
N storee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.7, 27.8 and 33.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that of N store was increased by 8.7, 27.8 and 33.8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“N supply increased the absolute content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–873 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K supply promoted conversion of storage N to photosynthetic N.

Treatment
Supply of Ke0
Outcome
transformation of N store to N psne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supply of K promoted the transformation of N store to N psn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K supply decreased leaf N content.

Treatment
Supply of Kt1
Outcome
leaf N content (N a )e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf N content (N a ) was indeed decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1261 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“Supply of K promoted the transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K increased relative photosynthetic N by 17.7%, 8.8% and 7.3%.

Treatment
K supplye0
Outcome
relative content of N psne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.7, 8.8 and 7.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K supply increased the relative content of N psn by 17.7, 8.8 and 7.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K decreased relative storage N by 24.2%, 11.4% and 8.7%.

Treatment
K supplyt1
Outcome
relative content of N storee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
24.2, 11.4 and 8.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased the relative content of N store by 24.2, 11.4 and 8.7% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“K supply increased the relative content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1408 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K supply increased leaf photosynthesis and PNUE through photosynthetic N allocation.

Treatment
K supplye0
Outcome
leaf P n and PNUEe0
Qualifier
increased the N psn contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K supply decreased the N a but increased the N psn content and then increased leaf P n and PNUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1659 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K supply increased PNUE.

Treatment
supply of Ke0
Outcome
PNUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The supply of K promoted the transformation of N store to N psn and increased the PNUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1790 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced storage N primarily reflected reduced non-protein N.

Outcome
decreased N storee0
Qualifier
decrease of non-protein Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decreased N store mainly resulted from the decrease of non-protein N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–1864 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N and K use could optimize leaf N allocation and maintain high photosynthetic N and PNUE.

Outcome
Combined use of N and Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined use of N and K could optimize leaf N allocation and maintain a high leaf N psn content and PNUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–1970 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–117 · show in text ↑

potassium · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 81 positive, 16 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.