Paper · 2019 · Journal of Food Science and Agricultural Technology (JFAT)

Evaluation of antioxidant and antifungal activities of pumpkin by-product and its application in banana

Paweena Jarungjitaree; Matchima Naradisorn

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pumpkin peel is a by-product which may contain some bioactive compounds. It should be of interest to investigate the efficacy of pumpkin peel to control postharvest disease. Anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum musae is a major postharvest disease and causes loss of banana in Thailand. The aims of this research were to investigate antioxidant activity and bioactive compounds in pumpkin peel and to investigate the antifungal activity of pumpkin peel crude extract against anthracnose in banana. Pumpkin peel (Cucurbita spp.) was extracted with three different solvents: methanol, ethanol and acetone in ratio of pumpkin peel to solvent at 1:5 (w/v). Methanol was the best solvent for extraction, showing the significant higher (P ≤ 0.05) values of DPPH (19.57 µmol TE / 100 g DW), FRAP (64.88 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW) and total phenolic content (92.25 mg GAE / 100 g DW), when compared with ethanol and acetone. Methanol at the concentrations of 95%, 70% and 50% were then used for extraction in a subsequent trial. The result showed that 50% methanol gave a significant higher (P ≤ 0.05) yield, DPPH (40.73 µmol TE / 100 g DW), FRAP (97.15 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW) and phenolic compound (202.43 mg GAE / 100 g DW) when compared with 95% and 70% methanol. The 50% methanol pumpkin peel crude extract was then diluted to 95%, 70% and 50% for antifungal assays, both in vitro and in vivo. The methanol pumpkin peel extract at all concentrations significantly delayed (P ≤ 0.05) radial growth of C. musae during incubation for 6 days in comparison with the control (dimethyl sulfoxide: DMSO). There was no significant difference between methanol pumpkin peel extracts and control (DMSO) in rot lesion development on banana during storage for 5 days. Although, pumpkin peel extract did not control banana anthracnose, it might be used in combination with fungicide. And hence, the use of chemical would possibly be reduced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol extraction gave higher DPPH activity than ethanol and acetone, at 19.57 µmol TE / 100 g DW.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
Methanole0
Outcome
DPPHe0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.57 µmol TE / 100 g DWe0
Comparator
ethanol and acetonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Methanol was the best solvent for extraction, showing the significant higher (P ≤ 0.05) values of DPPH (19.57 µmol TE / 100 g DW), FRAP (64.88 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW) and total phenolic content (92.25 mg GAE / 100 g DW), when compared with ethanol and acetone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol extraction gave higher FRAP activity, at 64.88 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
Methanole0
Outcome
FRAPe0
Direction
highere0
Value
64.88 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DWe0
Comparator
ethanol and acetonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Methanol was the best solvent for extraction, showing the significant higher (P ≤ 0.05) values of DPPH (19.57 µmol TE / 100 g DW), FRAP (64.88 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW) and total phenolic content (92.25 mg GAE / 100 g DW), when compared with ethanol and acetone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol extraction gave higher total phenolic content, at 92.25 mg GAE / 100 g DW.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
Methanole0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
92.25 mg GAE / 100 g DWe0
Comparator
ethanol and acetonee0

Verbatim

e0

“Methanol was the best solvent for extraction, showing the significant higher (P ≤ 0.05) values of DPPH (19.57 µmol TE / 100 g DW), FRAP (64.88 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW) and total phenolic content (92.25 mg GAE / 100 g DW), when compared with ethanol and acetone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% methanol gave significantly higher extraction yield than 95% and 70%.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
50% methanole0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
95% and 70% methanole0

Verbatim

e0

“50% methanol gave a significant higher (P ≤ 0.05) yield, DPPH (40.73 µmol TE / 100 g DW), FRAP (97.15 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW) and phenolic compound (202.43 mg GAE / 100 g DW) when compared with 95% and 70% methanol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% methanol gave higher DPPH activity, at 40.73 µmol TE / 100 g DW.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
50% methanole0
Outcome
DPPHe0
Direction
highere0
Value
40.73 µmol TE / 100 g DWe0
Comparator
95% and 70% methanole0

Verbatim

e0

“50% methanol gave a significant higher (P ≤ 0.05) yield, DPPH (40.73 µmol TE / 100 g DW), FRAP (97.15 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW) and phenolic compound (202.43 mg GAE / 100 g DW) when compared with 95% and 70% methanol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% methanol gave higher FRAP activity, at 97.15 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
50% methanole0
Outcome
FRAPe0
Direction
highere0
Value
97.15 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DWe0
Comparator
95% and 70% methanole0

Verbatim

e0

“50% methanol gave a significant higher (P ≤ 0.05) yield, DPPH (40.73 µmol TE / 100 g DW), FRAP (97.15 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW) and phenolic compound (202.43 mg GAE / 100 g DW) when compared with 95% and 70% methanol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% methanol gave higher phenolic compound content, at 202.43 mg GAE / 100 g DW.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
50% methanole0
Outcome
phenolic compounde0
Direction
highere0
Value
202.43 mg GAE / 100 g DWe0
Comparator
95% and 70% methanole0

Verbatim

e0

“50% methanol gave a significant higher (P ≤ 0.05) yield, DPPH (40.73 µmol TE / 100 g DW), FRAP (97.15 µmol Fe(ll) / 100 g DW) and phenolic compound (202.43 mg GAE / 100 g DW) when compared with 95% and 70% methanol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin peel extract at all concentrations significantly delayed C. musae radial growth.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Treatment
methanol pumpkin peel extract at all concentrationse0
Interactor
C. musaeColletotrichum musaee0pathogen
Outcome
radial growth of C. musaee0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
during incubation for 6 dayse0
Comparator
control (dimethyl sulfoxide: DMSO)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum musae
Colletotrichum musae · InteractorPlant pests and diseases · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The methanol pumpkin peel extract at all concentrations significantly delayed (P ≤ 0.05) radial growth of C. musae during incubation for 6 days in comparison with the control (dimethyl sulfoxide: DMSO)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin peel extract did not significantly alter banana rot lesions over five days.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
methanol pumpkin peel extractse0
Outcome
rot lesion developmente0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
during storage for 5 dayse0
Comparator
control (DMSO)e0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between methanol pumpkin peel extracts and control (DMSO) in rot lesion development on banana during storage for 5 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1754 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest combining pumpkin peel extract with fungicide.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Outcome
used in combination with fungicidee0

Verbatim

e0

“it might be used in combination with fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1869 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest such use might reduce chemical use.

Taxon
Pumpkint0
Outcome
use of chemical would possibly be reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“the use of chemical would possibly be reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–1927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pumpkin”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑

methanol · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.