Paper · 2019 · Journal of Biology Agriculture and Healthcare

Influence of Different Fertilizer Types on the Growth and Yield of Two Varieties Cucumber (Cucumis melo)

Lawal, B. A.; Ilupeju, E. A.; Ojeleye, A. E.; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The growth, yield and nutritional quality of Poinsett and Marketmore varieties of cucumber in response to compost and NPK fertilizer application were evaluated at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. The six fertilizer combinations are T1 (0 kg N), T2 (100% NPK, 600 kg NPK 15:15:15), T3 (100% Tithonia compost (TC), 5 tons/ha), T4 (75% NPK + 25% TC), T5 (50% NPK + 50% TC) and T6 (25% NPK+ 75% TC). The treatments were arranged as 6 × 2 factorial scheme in Randomised Complete Block Design with three replicates. Data were collected on growth parameters, fruit yield, calcium content and iron content. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance and difference among treatments means was computed using Least Significant Difference at 0.05 probability level. The results revealed that at the point of maximum growth Poinsett cucumber variety produced significant longer vine (173.78cm); higher number of leaves (23.56) and more robust stem girth (3.01 cm) than the other variety. At 8 weeks after sowing (WAS) the longest vine length (216.67cm) and number of leaves (29.33) were obtained from cucumber plants treated with 5 tons/ha. Varietal effect was not significant (p≤0.05) on cucumber fruit yield and firmness. The vine length, fruit girth, stem girth, number of leaves were significantly influenced by the application of 5 tons/ha. At 8 WAS, the longest vine 216.67cm and highest number of leaves (27.33) were recorded from 5 tons/ha, while the widest stem girth (2.10cm) was gotten from 50% NPK + 50% TC treated cucumber. Fruit yield was significantly improved by the application of different combination of fertilizer. Plant that received fertilizer had significant better fruit yield compared with non-fertilized one. However, the use of 50% NPK + 50% TC gave the highest fruit yield. The study concluded that combine application of 300 kg NPK + 2.5 ton/ha TC would be sufficient for production of the two varieties tried in this study. Keywords: Cucumber; farmyard manure; inorganic fertilizer; growth; yield. DOI : 10.7176/JBAH/9-14-03 Publication date :July 31 st 2019

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poinsett had longer vines at maximum growth than Marketmore.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Material
Poinsette0
Outcome
longer vinee0
Direction
longere0
Value
173.78cme0
Comparator
the other varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poinsett cucumber variety produced significant longer vine (173.78cm); higher number of leaves (23.56) and more robust stem girth (3.01 cm) than the other variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poinsett had more leaves at maximum growth.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Material
Poinsette0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.56e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poinsett cucumber variety produced significant longer vine (173.78cm); higher number of leaves (23.56) and more robust stem girth (3.01 cm) than the other variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poinsett had greater stem girth at maximum growth.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Material
Poinsette0
Outcome
stem girthe0
Direction
more robuste0
Value
3.01 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poinsett cucumber variety produced significant longer vine (173.78cm); higher number of leaves (23.56) and more robust stem girth (3.01 cm) than the other variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At eight weeks, 5 tons/ha produced the longest vines.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Organ / stage
8 weeks after sowinge0
Treatment
5 tons/hae0
Outcome
longest vine lengthe0
Direction
longeste0
Value
216.67cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 8 weeks after sowing (WAS) the longest vine length (216.67cm) and number of leaves (29.33) were obtained from cucumber plants treated with 5 tons/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At eight weeks, 5 tons/ha produced 29.33 leaves.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Treatment
5 tons/hae0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
29.33e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 8 weeks after sowing (WAS) the longest vine length (216.67cm) and number of leaves (29.33) were obtained from cucumber plants treated with 5 tons/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety did not significantly affect fruit yield or firmness.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Outcome
fruit yield and firmnesse0
Direction
not significante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varietal effect was not significant (p≤0.05) on cucumber fruit yield and firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five tons/ha significantly influenced vine length, fruit girth, stem girth and leaf number.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Treatment
5 tons/hae0
Outcome
vine length, fruit girth, stem girth, number of leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The vine length, fruit girth, stem girth, number of leaves were significantly influenced by the application of 5 tons/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At eight weeks, 5 tons/ha produced the longest vines in a second reported comparison.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Treatment
5 tons/hae0
Outcome
longest vinee0
Direction
longeste0
Value
216.67cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 8 WAS, the longest vine 216.67cm and highest number of leaves (27.33) were recorded from 5 tons/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At eight weeks, 5 tons/ha produced the highest leaf number, reported as 27.33.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Treatment
5 tons/hae0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
27.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 8 WAS, the longest vine 216.67cm and highest number of leaves (27.33) were recorded from 5 tons/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% NPK and 50% TC treatment produced the widest stem girth.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Treatment
50% NPK + 50% TCe0
Outcome
stem girthe0
Direction
wideste0
Value
2.10cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the widest stem girth (2.10cm) was gotten from 50% NPK + 50% TC treated cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer combinations significantly improved fruit yield.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Treatment
different combination of fertilizere0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield was significantly improved by the application of different combination of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized plants yielded more than unfertilized plants.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
non-fertilized onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant that received fertilizer had significant better fruit yield compared with non-fertilized one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The equal NPK and TC mix gave the highest fruit yield.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Treatment
50% NPK + 50% TCe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of 50% NPK + 50% TC gave the highest fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 300 kg NPK plus 2.5 ton/ha TC for the two varieties.

Taxon
Cucumis meloCucumis melot0
Treatment
300 kg NPK + 2.5 ton/ha TCe0
Outcome
production of the two varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combine application of 300 kg NPK + 2.5 ton/ha TC would be sufficient for production of the two varieties tried in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–2028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis melo)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

95 papers: 72 positive, 23 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 57 positive, 17 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.