Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Foliar Applications of Biostimulants Promote Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Strawberry Plants Grown under Nutrient Limitation

Sebastian Soppelsa; Markus Kelderer; Claudio Casera; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
130
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biostimulants have been found effective in enhancing plant resistance toward stressful conditions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of selected biostimulants to overcome the negative effects of nutrient limitation on the growth performances and on the fruit quality of soilless cultivated strawberry plants. The condition of nutrient limitation was imposed by supplying the plants with only a single fertilization at transplantation and by excluding any further nutrient supply for the entire duration of the experiment (three months, from May to July). Strawberry plants were treated seven times during the period from preflowering up to berry maturation with different classes of biostimulants (humic acids, alfalfa hydrolysate, macroseaweed extract and microalga hydrolysate, amino acids alone or in combination with zinc, B-group vitamins, chitosan, and a commercial product containing silicon) at commercial dosages. The use of alfalfa hydrolysate, vitamins, chitosan, and silicon was able to promote biomass accumulation in roots (four to seven folds) and fruits (+20%) of treated plants, whereas the total leaf area increased by 15%–30%. Nutrient concentrations in leaves and roots showed variations for microelements (e.g., Fe, B, Zn, and Si) in response to biostimulant applications, whereas no significant differences were observed for macronutrient contents among treatments. Final berry yield was found around 20% higher in chitosan- and silicon-treated plants. Chitosan treatment significantly increased pulp firmness (by 20%), while a high nutritional value (e.g., phenolic compounds concentration) was observed in alfalfa- and seaweed-treated fruits (+18%–20% as compared to control). The overall outcomes of the present experiment show that selected biostimulants can be considered as a valid agronomic tool able to contrast the negative consequence of growing crops under insufficient nutritional conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa hydrolysate promoted root biomass accumulation (four to seven folds) in strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
alfalfa hydrolysatee1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
promotee1
Value
four to seven foldse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of alfalfa hydrolysate, vitamins, chitosan, and silicon was able to promote biomass accumulation in roots (four to seven folds) and fruits (+20%) of treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamins promoted root biomass accumulation (four to seven folds) in strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
vitaminse1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
promotee1
Value
four to seven foldse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of alfalfa hydrolysate, vitamins, chitosan, and silicon was able to promote biomass accumulation in roots (four to seven folds) and fruits (+20%) of treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan promoted root biomass accumulation (four to seven folds) in strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
chitosane1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
promotee1
Value
four to seven foldse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of alfalfa hydrolysate, vitamins, chitosan, and silicon was able to promote biomass accumulation in roots (four to seven folds) and fruits (+20%) of treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon promoted root biomass accumulation (four to seven folds) in strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
silicone1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
promotee1
Value
four to seven foldse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of alfalfa hydrolysate, vitamins, chitosan, and silicon was able to promote biomass accumulation in roots (four to seven folds) and fruits (+20%) of treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa hydrolysate promoted fruit biomass accumulation (+20%) in strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
alfalfa hydrolysatee1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
promotee1
Value
+20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of alfalfa hydrolysate, vitamins, chitosan, and silicon was able to promote biomass accumulation in roots (four to seven folds) and fruits (+20%) of treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamins promoted fruit biomass accumulation (+20%) in strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
vitaminse1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
promotee1
Value
+20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of alfalfa hydrolysate, vitamins, chitosan, and silicon was able to promote biomass accumulation in roots (four to seven folds) and fruits (+20%) of treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan promoted fruit biomass accumulation (+20%) in strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
chitosane1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
promotee1
Value
+20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of alfalfa hydrolysate, vitamins, chitosan, and silicon was able to promote biomass accumulation in roots (four to seven folds) and fruits (+20%) of treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon promoted fruit biomass accumulation (+20%) in strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
silicone1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
promotee1
Value
+20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of alfalfa hydrolysate, vitamins, chitosan, and silicon was able to promote biomass accumulation in roots (four to seven folds) and fruits (+20%) of treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf area of strawberry plants increased by 15%–30% under the biostimulant treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
total leaf areae4
Direction
increasede4
Value
15%–30%e4

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas the total leaf area increased by 15%–30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1168 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient concentrations of microelements in leaves and roots varied in response to biostimulant applications.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse2
Treatment
biostimulant applicationse2
Outcome
Nutrient concentrationse2
Qualifier
microelements (e.g., Fe, B, Zn, and Si)e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nutrient concentrations in leaves and roots showed variations for microelements (e.g., Fe, B, Zn, and Si) in response to biostimulant applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences in macronutrient contents among the biostimulant treatments of strawberry plants.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
treatmentse3
Outcome
macronutrient contentse3
Direction
no significant differencese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas no significant differences were observed for macronutrient contents among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-treated strawberry plants had final berry yield around 20% higher.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
chitosane5
Outcome
Final berry yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
20%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e5

“Final berry yield was found around 20% higher in chitosan- and silicon-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon-treated strawberry plants had final berry yield around 20% higher.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
silicone5
Outcome
Final berry yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
20%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e5

“Final berry yield was found around 20% higher in chitosan- and silicon-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan treatment significantly increased strawberry pulp firmness by 20%.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
pulpe6
Treatment
Chitosan treatmente6
Outcome
pulp firmnesse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
20%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e6

“Chitosan treatment significantly increased pulp firmness (by 20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa-treated strawberry fruits showed a high phenolic compound concentration (+18%–20%) compared with control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
fruitse7
Treatment
alfalfae7
Outcome
phenolic compounds concentratione7
Direction
highe7
Value
+18%–20%e7
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e7

“a high nutritional value (e.g., phenolic compounds concentration) was observed in alfalfa- and seaweed-treated fruits (+18%–20% as compared to control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweed-treated strawberry fruits showed a high phenolic compound concentration (+18%–20%) compared with control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Organ / stage
fruitse7
Treatment
seaweede7
Outcome
phenolic compounds concentratione7
Direction
highe7
Value
+18%–20%e7
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soilless cultivated strawberry plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–331 · show in text ↑
e7

“a high nutritional value (e.g., phenolic compounds concentration) was observed in alfalfa- and seaweed-treated fruits (+18%–20% as compared to control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1723 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

chitosan · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

chitosan · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

other · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.