Paper · 2019

DO ORGANIC AND INORGANIC MULCHES AFFECTS SOIL MOISTURE CONSERVATION AND CROP YIELD

Safia Naureen Malik; Abid Subhani; Riffat Bibi; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil moisture conservation is an important issue of rainfed area. Mulching as a soil cover is of great importance for conserving soil moisture and consequently crop yield. A field experiment was executed at Soil and Water Conservation Research Institute, Chakwal during the years 2015 to 2017. The objective of the study was to elucidate the effect of organic and inorganic mulches on growth and yield of chili crop. The experiment was carried out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four treatments replicated thrice. The mulching material includes organic (wheat straw) and inorganic (black plastic sheet and transparent plastic sheet) with a control treatment of un-mulched/ uncovered plot. The results revealed that the highest average soil moisture content (17.4%) was observed in black plastic mulch followed by (16.8%) in the treatment with transparent plastic mulch as compared to un-mulched (11.3%) treatment. The maximum plant height (44.7cm) and fruit yield (293g/ plant) was observed in transparent plastic mulch treatment. Wheat straw improved the fruit yield (228g/plant) as compared to un-mulched (172g/plant). Capsaicin content (0.188 %) in chili fruit was recorded in control as compared to all mulched treatments. Therefore, mulching either organic or inorganic are found to be an important tool to conserve soil moisture and shown positive effect on soil moisture conservation as well as plant growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black plastic mulch produced the highest soil moisture content, 17.4%, versus 11.3% unmulched.

Taxon
chili cropt0
Treatment
black plastic mulche0
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
17.4%e0
Qualifier
11.3%e0
Comparator
un-mulchede0

Verbatim

t0

“effect of organic and inorganic mulches on growth and yield of chili crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–416 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results revealed that the highest average soil moisture content (17.4%) was observed in black plastic mulch followed by (16.8%) in the treatment with transparent plastic mulch as compared to un-mulched (11.3%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent plastic mulch produced soil moisture content of 16.8% versus 11.3% unmulched.

Taxon
chili cropt0
Treatment
transparent plastic mulche0
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
16.8%e0
Qualifier
11.3%e0
Comparator
un-mulchede0

Verbatim

t0

“effect of organic and inorganic mulches on growth and yield of chili crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–416 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results revealed that the highest average soil moisture content (17.4%) was observed in black plastic mulch followed by (16.8%) in the treatment with transparent plastic mulch as compared to un-mulched (11.3%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent plastic mulch gave maximum plant height of 44.7cm.

Taxon
chili cropt0
Treatment
transparent plastic mulch treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
44.7cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“effect of organic and inorganic mulches on growth and yield of chili crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–416 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum plant height (44.7cm) and fruit yield (293g/ plant) was observed in transparent plastic mulch treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent plastic mulch gave maximum fruit yield of 293g/ plant.

Taxon
chili cropt0
Treatment
transparent plastic mulch treatmente0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
293g/ plante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“effect of organic and inorganic mulches on growth and yield of chili crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–416 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum plant height (44.7cm) and fruit yield (293g/ plant) was observed in transparent plastic mulch treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw increased fruit yield to 228g/plant compared with 172g/plant unmulched.

Taxon
chili cropt0
Treatment
Wheat strawe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
228g/plante0
Qualifier
172g/plante0
Comparator
un-mulchede0

Verbatim

t0

“effect of organic and inorganic mulches on growth and yield of chili crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–416 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wheat straw improved the fruit yield (228g/plant) as compared to un-mulched (172g/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control chili fruit had capsaicin content of 0.188% compared with mulched treatments.

Taxon
chili cropt0
Organ / stage
chili fruite0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
Capsaicin contente0
Value
0.188 %e0
Comparator
all mulched treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“effect of organic and inorganic mulches on growth and yield of chili crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–416 · show in text ↑
e0

“Capsaicin content (0.188 %) in chili fruit was recorded in control as compared to all mulched treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1243 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

41 papers: 39 positive, 2 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

mulching · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

mulching · quality: grain · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.