Paper · 2019 · Journal of Plant Registrations

‘TAM 204’ Wheat, Adapted to Grazing, Grain, and Graze‐out Production Systems in the Southern High Plains

Jackie C. Rudd; Ravindra N. Devkota; Amir M. Ibrahim; et al.

17
claims
45
verbatim quotes
13
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

‘TAM 204’ (Reg. no. CV‐1155, PI 686859), a hard red winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar with the experimental designation of TX06V7266, was developed and released by Texas A&M AgriLife Research in 2014. TAM 204 is an F 4 –derived line from the cross ‘TAM 112’/TX01M5009 made at Vernon, TX, in 2001. TAM 204 is an apically awnletted, medium‐maturing, semidwarf wheat with red glumes. It was released primarily as a grain, dual‐purpose, and graze‐out wheat with high grain and forage yield potential. It has good acid soil tolerance, is resistant to Soil‐borne wheat mosaic virus , Wheat streak mosaic virus and its vector wheat curl mite, greenbug, stem rust and stripe rust, and it is moderately susceptible to leaf rust. TAM 204 has a high level of resistance to Hessian fly biotypes GP and vH9 and a moderate level of resistance to biotype vH13. Compared with ‘TAM 111’, which is currently the most widely grown cultivars in Texas, TAM 204 has significantly higher grain yield in the Texas High Plains under both irrigated and dryland environments. Compared with ‘TAM 401’ and ‘Weathermaster 135’, which are currently the two most popular apically awnletted cultivars in Texas, TAM 204 has similar forage yield but higher grain yield across a wide range of environments. TAM 204 could be a better option for wheat growers and cattle owners under grain‐only, dual‐purpose (grazing‐plus‐grain), and graze‐out production system in the southern US Great Plains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 was developed and released as a wheat cultivar in 2014.

Taxon
wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Material
TAM 204e2
Outcome
developed and releasede0
Value
2014e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: Release year is a resource descriptor.

Verbatim

e0

“was developed and released by Texas A&M AgriLife Research in 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“TAM 204 is an F 4 –derived line”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 has apical awnlets, medium maturity, semidwarf stature, and red glumes.

Material
TAM 204e0
Outcome
apically awnletted, medium‐maturing, semidwarf wheat with red glumese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TAM 204 is an apically awnletted, medium‐maturing, semidwarf wheat with red glumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–391 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 has high grain and forage yield potential.

Material
TAM 204t1
Outcome
high grain and forage yield potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high grain and forage yield potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 has good acid soil tolerance.

Material
TAM 204t1
Outcome
good acid soil tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It has good acid soil tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 resists Soil‐borne wheat mosaic virus.

Material
TAM 204t1
Interactor
Soil‐borne wheat mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
resistant to Soil‐borne wheat mosaic viruse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“is resistant to Soil‐borne wheat mosaic virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 resists Wheat streak mosaic virus.

Material
TAM 204t1
Interactor
Wheat streak mosaic virusWheat streak mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
Wheat streak mosaic viruse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat streak mosaic virus and its vector wheat curl mite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 resists wheat curl mite.

Material
TAM 204t1
Interactor
wheat curl miteAceria tosichellae0pest
Outcome
wheat curl mitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aceria tosichella
Aceria tosichella · InteractorAnna Skoracka, Brian G. Rector Brian, and Gary L. Hein · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its vector wheat curl mite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 resists greenbug.

Material
TAM 204t1
Interactor
greenbugSchizaphis graminume0pest
Outcome
greenbuge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Schizaphis graminum
Schizaphis graminum · InteractorKent Loeffler · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenbug, stem rust and stripe rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 resists stem rust.

Material
TAM 204t1
Interactor
stem ruste0pathogen
Outcome
stem ruste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem rust and stripe rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 resists stripe rust.

Material
TAM 204t1
Interactor
stripe ruste0pathogen
Outcome
stripe ruste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stripe rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 is moderately susceptible to leaf rust.

Material
TAM 204t1
Interactor
leaf ruste0pathogen
Outcome
moderately susceptible to leaf ruste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderately susceptible to leaf rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 has high resistance to Hessian fly biotypes GP and vH9.

Material
TAM 204t1
Interactor
Hessian fly biotypes GP and vH9e0pest
Outcome
high level of resistance to Hessian fly biotypes GP and vH9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high level of resistance to Hessian fly biotypes GP and vH9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 has moderate resistance to Hessian fly biotype vH13.

Material
TAM 204t1
Interactor
biotype vH13e0pest
Outcome
moderate level of resistance to biotype vH13e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate level of resistance to biotype vH13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘TAM 204’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 has significantly higher grain yield than TAM 111 under irrigated and dryland conditions in the Texas High Plains.

Material
TAM 204e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under both irrigated and dryland environmentse0
Comparator
‘TAM 111’e0
Setting
Texas High Plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with ‘TAM 111’, which is currently the most widely grown cultivars in Texas, TAM 204 has significantly higher grain yield in the Texas High Plains under both irrigated and dryland environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 has forage yield similar to TAM 401 and Weathermaster 135.

Material
TAM 204e0
Outcome
forage yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
‘TAM 401’ and ‘Weathermaster 135’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with ‘TAM 401’ and ‘Weathermaster 135’, which are currently the two most popular apically awnletted cultivars in Texas, TAM 204 has similar forage yield but higher grain yield across a wide range of environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 204 has higher grain yield than TAM 401 and Weathermaster 135 across varied environments.

Material
TAM 204e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
across a wide range of environmentse0
Comparator
‘TAM 401’ and ‘Weathermaster 135’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with ‘TAM 401’ and ‘Weathermaster 135’, which are currently the two most popular apically awnletted cultivars in Texas, TAM 204 has similar forage yield but higher grain yield across a wide range of environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest TAM 204 as a better option for grain-only, dual-purpose, and graze-out systems in the southern US Great Plains.

Material
TAM 204e0
Outcome
better optione0
Setting
southern US Great Plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TAM 204 could be a better option for wheat growers and cattle owners under grain‐only, dual‐purpose (grazing‐plus‐grain), and graze‐out production system in the southern US Great Plains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑