Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Regulated Deficit Irrigation as a Water-Saving Strategy for Onion Cultivation in Mediterranean Conditions

Abdelsattar Abdelkhalik; Bernardo Pascual; Inmaculada Nájera; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
32
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were performed for two growing seasons in Spain under Mediterranean conditions to evaluate the response of onion growth, plant water status, bulb yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE), and gross revenue to regulated deficit irrigation strategies (RDI). Seven irrigation treatments were utilized, including the application of 100% irrigation water requirements (IWR) during the entire growing season and the application of 75% or 50% of the IWR during one of the following growth stages: the vegetative growth, bulbing, and bulb ripening stages. The deficit irrigation strategies tested decreased marketable yields to greater or lesser extents; therefore, if water is readily available, full irrigation would be recommended. The RDI with 50% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stage led to important water savings (22%) and to slight decreases in yield (9%), improving IWUE (20%) compared with full irrigation, and this strategy can be recommended under a severe water shortage. A satisfactory bulb yield was obtained with RDI with 75% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stages, resulting in a lower reduction in yield (4%) and in an increased IWUE (9%); this strategy is an advisable strategy for onion production under a mild water shortage in Mediterranean conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation strategies decreased marketable onion yields to greater or lesser extents.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
deficit irrigation strategiese0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The deficit irrigation strategies tested decreased marketable yields to greater or lesser extents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

If water is readily available, full irrigation is recommended for onion.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
full irrigation would be recommendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if water is readily available, full irrigation would be recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI with 50% of the IWR during bulb ripening saved 22% of water compared with full irrigation.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
RDI with 50% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stagee0
Outcome
water savingse0
Direction
savingse0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RDI with 50% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stage led to important water savings (22%) and to slight decreases in yield (9%), improving IWUE (20%) compared with full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI with 50% of the IWR during bulb ripening slightly decreased onion yield by 9% compared with full irrigation.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
RDI with 50% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RDI with 50% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stage led to important water savings (22%) and to slight decreases in yield (9%), improving IWUE (20%) compared with full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI with 50% of the IWR during bulb ripening improved IWUE by 20% compared with full irrigation.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
RDI with 50% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stagee0
Outcome
IWUEe0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RDI with 50% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stage led to important water savings (22%) and to slight decreases in yield (9%), improving IWUE (20%) compared with full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend RDI with 50% of the IWR during bulb ripening under a severe water shortage.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
recommended under a severe water shortagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this strategy can be recommended under a severe water shortage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI with 75% of the IWR during bulb ripening gave a lower reduction in onion yield of 4%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
RDI with 75% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stagese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A satisfactory bulb yield was obtained with RDI with 75% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stages, resulting in a lower reduction in yield (4%) and in an increased IWUE (9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI with 75% of the IWR during bulb ripening increased IWUE by 9%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
RDI with 75% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stagese0
Outcome
IWUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A satisfactory bulb yield was obtained with RDI with 75% of the IWR during the bulb ripening stages, resulting in a lower reduction in yield (4%) and in an increased IWUE (9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

RDI with 75% of the IWR during bulb ripening is advisable for onion production under a mild water shortage in Mediterranean conditions.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
advisable strategy for onion productione0
Qualifier
mild water shortagee0
Setting
Mediterranean conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this strategy is an advisable strategy for onion production under a mild water shortage in Mediterranean conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1297 · show in text ↑

stage · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

stage · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

irrigation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 106 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

harvest time · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.