Paper · 2019 · PLoS ONE

Effects of foliar application of amino acid liquid fertilizers, with or without Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9, on cowpea yield and leaf microbiota

Dongsheng Wang; Xuhui Deng; Bei Wang; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Leaf surface fertilization with liquid fertilizer produced from amino acids constitutes a potentially important source of nitrogen and is important for plant production. However, few reports have focused on the plant growth promotion by novel liquid fertilizers created by new amino acid resources, let alone the influence on leaf microbiota. In this study, the effects of liquid fertilizer, created by amino acids hydrolyzed from animal hairs with or without the PGPR strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9, on crop yield and leaf microbiota were investigated. The results showed that leaves sprayed with amino acid liquid fertilizer (AA) and liquid biological fertilizer (AA9) persistently increased cowpea yields compared to the control amended with chemical fertilizer (CF). Fertilization with amino acid fertilizer showed no significant difference in microbial composition compared with the CF treatment; however, the introduction of functional microbes altered the microbial composition. Pearson correlation analysis, VPA analysis and SEM models all revealed that the amino acids liquid fertilizer application, but not the functional strain or the altered microbiota, performed as the direct driver attributing to yield enhancement. We conclude that leaf fertilization with a novel amino acid liquid fertilizer can greatly enhance the crop yield and that the addition of beneficial microbes may perform the role in further altering the composition of leaf microbiota.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid fertilizer increased cowpea yield relative to chemical fertilizer.

Treatment
amino acid liquid fertilizer (AA)e0
Outcome
cowpea yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control amended with chemical fertilizer (CF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaves sprayed with amino acid liquid fertilizer (AA) and liquid biological fertilizer (AA9) persistently increased cowpea yields compared to the control amended with chemical fertilizer (CF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid biological fertilizer increased cowpea yield relative to chemical fertilizer.

Treatment
liquid biological fertilizer (AA9)e0
Interactor
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9Bacillus velezensis SQR9e1symbiont
Outcome
cowpea yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control amended with chemical fertilizer (CF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaves sprayed with amino acid liquid fertilizer (AA) and liquid biological fertilizer (AA9) persistently increased cowpea yields compared to the control amended with chemical fertilizer (CF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“the PGPR strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid fertilizer did not significantly change microbial composition relative to chemical fertilizer.

Treatment
amino acid fertilizere0
Outcome
microbial compositione0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
CF treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with amino acid fertilizer showed no significant difference in microbial composition compared with the CF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introducing functional microbes altered microbial composition.

Treatment
introduction of functional microbese0
Outcome
microbial compositione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the introduction of functional microbes altered the microbial composition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model analyses attributed yield enhancement directly to amino acid fertilizer application.

Treatment
amino acids liquid fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
yield enhancemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pearson correlation analysis, VPA analysis and SEM models all revealed that the amino acids liquid fertilizer application, but not the functional strain or the altered microbiota, performed as the direct driver attributing to yield enhancement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑

amino acid · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.