Paper · 2017 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Application of biofertilization and biological control for cowpea production

M. Hassan

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was carried out during two successive seasons 2014 and 2015 for evaluating the effect of inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus circulans, Glomus macrocarpum instead a part of chemical fertilization in the presence of biocontrol agent i.e., Pseudomonas fluorescens on some microbial enzymes activity, growth characteristics, some biological constituent as well as yield and its components for optimal nutrition and some attributes of cowpeas. Obtained data showed significant increases of dehydrogenase (DH), nitrogenase and phosphatase activity in both seasons using of the combination of biofertilization and chemical nitrogen fertilization. Moreover, the values of NH4-N, NO3-N, available-P and soluble-K were the highest records with dual application of biofertilizers and half dose of chemical fertilization. Concerning, vegetative growth parameters and total yield, NPK-microbial inoculants combined with NPK-mineral fertilizers had the highest values. The results of this study suggest that, it may be replaced the mineral fertilizers by biofertilizers, even partially, to produce a better food and such integrated nutrient management program should be followed to produce the highest yield of cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biofertilization and chemical nitrogen fertilization significantly increased dehydrogenase, nitrogenase and phosphatase activity in both seasons.

Treatment
combination of biofertilization and chemical nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
dehydrogenase (DH), nitrogenase and phosphatase activitye0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increases of dehydrogenase (DH), nitrogenase and phosphatase activity in both seasons using of the combination of biofertilization and chemical nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium and nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus and soluble potassium were highest under biofertilizers plus a half dose of chemical fertilizer.

Treatment
dual application of biofertilizers and half dose of chemical fertilizatione0
Outcome
NH4-N, NO3-N, available-P and soluble-Ke0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the values of NH4-N, NO3-N, available-P and soluble-K were the highest records with dual application of biofertilizers and half dose of chemical fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK microbial inoculants combined with mineral fertilizers gave the highest vegetative growth parameters.

Treatment
NPK-microbial inoculants combined with NPK-mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
vegetative growth parameterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vegetative growth parameters and total yield, NPK-microbial inoculants combined with NPK-mineral fertilizers had the highest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK microbial inoculants combined with mineral fertilizers gave the highest total yield.

Treatment
NPK-microbial inoculants combined with NPK-mineral fertilizerse0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vegetative growth parameters and total yield, NPK-microbial inoculants combined with NPK-mineral fertilizers had the highest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest partially replacing mineral fertilizers with biofertilizers for cowpea production.

Outcome
replaced the mineral fertilizers by biofertilizers, even partiallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it may be replaced the mineral fertilizers by biofertilizers, even partially, to produce a better food”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrated nutrient management to maximize cowpea yield.

Outcome
integrated nutrient management program should be followed to produce the highest yield of cowpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“such integrated nutrient management program should be followed to produce the highest yield of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1245 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 131 positive, 12 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.