Paper · 2019 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of zeolite particle size and levels of phosphate concentration in phosphate absorption and growth of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench

S A’isyah; T P Napitupulu; I M Sudiana

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Medium particle size plays an important role in plant growth and absorbtion of nutrients. Pore types affect root development and infiltration. In addition, zeolite can increase the efficiency of nutrient use by increasing the availability of phosphate rock and exchange cation without structural changes. The experimental to determine the optimal particle size of zeolite in absorbing phosphate with design a complete random block. Media composition consists of coarse zeolite (ZK) and fine zeolite (ZH) with ratio of 50% ZK + 50% ZH (A1), 25% ZK + 75% ZH (A2) and 75% ZK + 25% ZH (A3). ZK and ZH distribution by mixing it in the tray. The result show that the percentage of survival is A3 which has 78%, A2 and A1 having 33%. Respectively, medium 75% ZK + 25% ZH (A3) was tested for phosphate absorption test, using 5 different levels namely 0 mM phosphate levels (A31), 0.3 mM (A32), 1 mM (A33), 3 mM (A34), and 10 mM (A35). Experimental results that addition of 10 mM phosphate (A35) increased plant length by 51.35%, leaf width 42.50%, wet and dry weight by 156.52% and 195, 54%, weight wet root 53.46% and phosphate content 195.58%. It can be concluded that A3 support the phosphate absorption to sorghum growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The A3 zeolite mixture gave 78% survival.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
A3e0
Outcome
percentage of survivale0
Value
78%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of survival is A3 which has 78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A2 and A1 each gave 33% survival.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
A2 and A1e0
Outcome
survivale1
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A2 and A1 having 33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–734 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percentage of survival is A3 which has 78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mM phosphate increased plant length by 51.35%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
10 mM phosphatee0
Outcome
plant lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
51.35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of 10 mM phosphate (A35) increased plant length by 51.35%, leaf width 42.50%, wet and dry weight by 156.52% and 195, 54%, weight wet root 53.46% and phosphate content 195.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mM phosphate increased leaf width by 42.50%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
10 mM phosphatee0
Outcome
leaf widthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of 10 mM phosphate (A35) increased plant length by 51.35%, leaf width 42.50%, wet and dry weight by 156.52% and 195, 54%, weight wet root 53.46% and phosphate content 195.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mM phosphate increased wet by 156.52%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
10 mM phosphatee0
Outcome
wete0
Direction
increasede0
Value
156.52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of 10 mM phosphate (A35) increased plant length by 51.35%, leaf width 42.50%, wet and dry weight by 156.52% and 195, 54%, weight wet root 53.46% and phosphate content 195.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mM phosphate increased dry weight by 195, 54%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
10 mM phosphatee0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
195, 54%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of 10 mM phosphate (A35) increased plant length by 51.35%, leaf width 42.50%, wet and dry weight by 156.52% and 195, 54%, weight wet root 53.46% and phosphate content 195.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mM phosphate increased weight wet root by 53.46%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
10 mM phosphatee0
Outcome
weight wet roote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53.46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of 10 mM phosphate (A35) increased plant length by 51.35%, leaf width 42.50%, wet and dry weight by 156.52% and 195, 54%, weight wet root 53.46% and phosphate content 195.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 mM phosphate increased phosphate content by 195.58%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
10 mM phosphatee0
Outcome
phosphate contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
195.58%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of 10 mM phosphate (A35) increased plant length by 51.35%, leaf width 42.50%, wet and dry weight by 156.52% and 195, 54%, weight wet root 53.46% and phosphate content 195.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–123 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A3 supported phosphate absorption and sorghum growth.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
A3e0
Outcome
phosphate absorption to sorghum growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A3 support the phosphate absorption to sorghum growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–123 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.