Paper · 2019 · Journal of Seed Science

Ameliorative effects of TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat under PEG-stimulated drought stress

Javad Faraji; Ali Sepehri

18
claims
27
verbatim quotes
71
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract: Seed germination and early seedling growth are sensitive to drought stress in wheat. A factorial experiment was arranged based on a completely randomized design with three replicates to study the impacts of TiO2 nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs: 0, 500, 1000 and 2000 mg.L) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP: 0 and 100 μM), as NO donor, on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat under polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced drought stress (0, -0.4 and -0.8 MPa). Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds. However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress. Our results showed that application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination can significantly alleviate the adverse effects of PEG-stimulated drought stress on seed germination and early seedling growth of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG drought decreased germination percentage (GP) in wheat.

Treatment
PEG-stimulated drought stresse0
Outcome
germination percentage (GP)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG drought decreased germination energy (GE) in wheat.

Treatment
PEG-stimulated drought stresse0
Outcome
germination energy (GE)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG drought decreased germination rate (GR) in wheat.

Treatment
PEG-stimulated drought stresse0
Outcome
germination rate (GR)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG drought decreased root length (RL) in wheat.

Treatment
PEG-stimulated drought stresse0
Outcome
root length (RL)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG drought decreased shoot length (SL) in wheat.

Treatment
PEG-stimulated drought stresse0
Outcome
shoot length (SL)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG drought decreased root fresh weight (RFW) in wheat.

Treatment
PEG-stimulated drought stresse0
Outcome
root fresh weight (RFW)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG drought decreased shoot fresh weight (SFW) in wheat.

Treatment
PEG-stimulated drought stresse0
Outcome
shoot fresh weight (SFW)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG drought decreased vigor index (VI) in wheat.

Treatment
PEG-stimulated drought stresse0
Outcome
vigor index (VI)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG drought increased mean germination time in wheat.

Treatment
PEG-stimulated drought stresse0
Outcome
mean germination time (MGT)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results revealed that PEG-stimulated drought stress significantly decreased germination percentage (GP), germination energy (GE), germination rate (GR), root length (RL), shoot length (SL), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot fresh weight (SFW) and vigor index (VI) but increased mean germination time (MGT) in wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside enhanced GP under severe drought by up to 23.72%.

Treatment
application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
GPe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
23.72%e0
Qualifier
under severe drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside enhanced GE under severe drought by up to 50%.

Treatment
application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
GEe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
under severe drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside enhanced GR under severe drought by up to 33.74%.

Treatment
application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
GRe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
33.74%e0
Qualifier
under severe drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside enhanced RL under severe drought by up to 85.38%.

Treatment
application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
RLe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
85.38%e0
Qualifier
under severe drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside enhanced SL under severe drought by up to 93.28%.

Treatment
application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
SLe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
93.28%e0
Qualifier
under severe drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside enhanced RFW under severe drought by up to 73%.

Treatment
application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
RFWe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
73%e0
Qualifier
under severe drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside enhanced SFW under severe drought by up to 91.91%.

Treatment
application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
SFWe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
91.91%e0
Qualifier
under severe drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside enhanced VI under severe drought by up to 91.04%.

Treatment
application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
VIe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
91.04%e0
Qualifier
under severe drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 nanoparticles and sodium nitroprusside reduced mean germination time by up to 28.36% under severe drought.

Treatment
application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combinatione0
Outcome
MGTe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
28.36%e0
Qualifier
under severe drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, application of TiO2 NPs and SNP alone or in combination significantly enhanced GP, GE, GR, RL, SL, RFW, SFW and VI up to 23.72%, 50%, 33.74%, 85.38%, 93.28%, 73%, 91.91% and 91.04% respectively, but significantly reduced MGT up to 28.36% under severe drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–116 · show in text ↑

titanium dioxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 35 positive, 0 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 343 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.