Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Agronomy

Influence of Cutting Date and Nitrogen Fertilizer Levels on Growth, Forage Yield, and Quality of Sudan Grass in a Semiarid Environment

S. J. L. Ziki; E. M. I. Zeidan; A. Y. A. El-Banna; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sudan grass is less sensitive to water shortage and produces large amounts of biomass. For these reasons, it is a promising summer forage crop for arid and semiarid regions where natural pastures are rare and water scarcity limits summer forage production. The aim of the present work was to investigate the influence of cutting date (early and late, for three cuts) and three nitrogen (N) fertilizer levels (35, 70, and 105 kg N/ha/cut) on Sudan grass ( Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf.). The study was carried out in the experimental farm of Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Egypt, during 2016 and 2017 summer seasons using a split-plot design. The results obtained revealed significant differences between the two cutting dates on growth, forage yield, and quality of Sudan grass. The late cutting date (56 days after sowing DAS and 42 days after the 1 st cut) gave the highest values for almost all the growth characters, dry forage yield in addition to total dry yield (TDY) in both seasons. The highest number of shoots/plant (1.911), leaf area/plant (2841.6 cm 2 ), and dry forage weight (g)/plant (76.65 g) were obtained by late cutting (56 DAS) with the application of 105 kg N/ha/cut. The lowest values of these characters were recorded with 35 kg N/ha/cut. Quality parameters were significantly affected by N levels during both seasons, while cutting date significantly affected the protein yield (kg/ha). The interaction result apparently indicated that the highest dry forage yield of Sudan grass (16.26 ton/ha) was achievable at the 1 st cut with the application of the highest N level (105 kg N/ha/cut).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting dates differed significantly in growth, yield and quality.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie0
Treatment
two cutting datese0
Outcome
growth, forage yield, and qualitye0
Comparator
two cutting datese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences between the two cutting dates on growth, forage yield, and quality of Sudan grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late cutting gave the highest growth characters.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
late cutting datee0
Outcome
growth characterse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The late cutting date (56 days after sowing DAS and 42 days after the 1 st cut) gave the highest values for almost all the growth characters, dry forage yield in addition to total dry yield (TDY) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sudan Grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late cutting gave the highest dry forage yield and total dry yield.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
late cutting datee0
Outcome
dry forage yield in addition to total dry yield (TDY)e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The late cutting date (56 days after sowing DAS and 42 days after the 1 st cut) gave the highest values for almost all the growth characters, dry forage yield in addition to total dry yield (TDY) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sudan Grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late cutting with 105 kg N/ha/cut yielded 1.911 shoots per plant.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
late cutting (56 DAS) with the application of 105 kg N/ha/cute0
Outcome
number of shoots/plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.911e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of shoots/plant (1.911), leaf area/plant (2841.6 cm 2 ), and dry forage weight (g)/plant (76.65 g) were obtained by late cutting (56 DAS) with the application of 105 kg N/ha/cut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sudan Grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late cutting with 105 kg N/ha/cut yielded 2841.6 cm 2 leaf area per plant.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
late cutting (56 DAS) with the application of 105 kg N/ha/cute0
Outcome
leaf area/plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2841.6 cm 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of shoots/plant (1.911), leaf area/plant (2841.6 cm 2 ), and dry forage weight (g)/plant (76.65 g) were obtained by late cutting (56 DAS) with the application of 105 kg N/ha/cut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sudan Grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late cutting with 105 kg N/ha/cut yielded 76.65 g dry forage weight per plant.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
late cutting (56 DAS) with the application of 105 kg N/ha/cute0
Outcome
dry forage weight (g)/plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
76.65 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of shoots/plant (1.911), leaf area/plant (2841.6 cm 2 ), and dry forage weight (g)/plant (76.65 g) were obtained by late cutting (56 DAS) with the application of 105 kg N/ha/cut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sudan Grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest values of these growth traits occurred with 35 kg N/ha/cut.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
35 kg N/ha/cute0
Outcome
these characterse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest values of these characters were recorded with 35 kg N/ha/cut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sudan Grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen levels significantly affected quality in both seasons.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
N levelse0
Outcome
Quality parameterse0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quality parameters were significantly affected by N levels during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sudan Grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting date significantly affected protein yield.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiit0
Treatment
cutting datee0
Outcome
protein yield (kg/ha)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cutting date significantly affected the protein yield (kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sudan Grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At first cut, 105 kg N/ha/cut gave the highest dry forage yield, 16.26 ton/ha.

Taxon
Sudan grassSorghum ×drummondiie0
Treatment
highest N level (105 kg N/ha/cut)e0
Outcome
dry forage yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.26 ton/hae0
Qualifier
1 st cute0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · TaxonUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest dry forage yield of Sudan grass (16.26 ton/ha) was achievable at the 1 st cut with the application of the highest N level (105 kg N/ha/cut)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1628 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

pruning · growth · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
    No pre-sowing nitrogen produced 6·7 cm plants, similar to urea.

    Effect of urea and ammonium sulphate applied before sowing on sudangrass seedlings · 1976 · compared with urea

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pruning · yield · Sorghum x drummondii (Sudan grass)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.