Abstract
A field experiment was conducted for three consecutive years from 2013-14 to 2015-16 at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India. The experiment was laid out in split plot design, planting methods as main plot treatments and levels of nitrogen as sub plot treatments under drip fertigation. The main plot treatments constitute paired row planting with single node seedlings, paired row planting with bud chip seedlings, dual row planting with single node seedlings, dual row planting with bud chip seedlings and normal planting with three budded setts. Sub plot treatments are 75% RDN, 100% RDN and 150% recommended dose of nitrogen supplied through drip. Pooled data analysis of three years indicated that planting of single node seed lings in dual rows of 15045 cm 2 (103.6 t ha -1 ) or paired rows of 60/12060 cm (102.4 t ha -1 ) registered significantly higher cane yield as compared to the planting of bud chip seedlings in dual rows or paired rows and planting of three budded setts in furrows. Sugarcane cultivation with single node seedlings increased the cane yield to the tune of 5.0% compared to the normal planting under drip fertigation. However, bud chip seedlings also performed well in dual row planting. Application of nitrogen at 150% recommended dose through fertigation recorded significantly higher cane yield of 104.8 t ha -1 than 75% or 100% RDN.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Single-node seedlings in dual rows yielded 103.6 t ha -1, significantly more than bud chip seedlings in dual or paired rows and three-budded setts.
Verbatim
e0“planting of single node seed lings in dual rows of 15045 cm 2 (103.6 t ha -1 ) or paired rows of 60/12060 cm (102.4 t ha -1 ) registered significantly higher cane yield as compared to the planting of bud chip seedlings in dual rows or paired rows and planting of three budded setts in furrows”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Single-node seedlings in paired rows yielded 102.4 t ha -1, significantly more than bud chip seedlings in dual or paired rows and three-budded setts.
Verbatim
e0“planting of single node seed lings in dual rows of 15045 cm 2 (103.6 t ha -1 ) or paired rows of 60/12060 cm (102.4 t ha -1 ) registered significantly higher cane yield as compared to the planting of bud chip seedlings in dual rows or paired rows and planting of three budded setts in furrows”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Single-node seedlings increased cane yield by 5.0% compared with normal planting under drip fertigation.
Verbatim
e0“Sugarcane cultivation with single node seedlings increased the cane yield to the tune of 5.0% compared to the normal planting under drip fertigation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bud chip seedlings performed well in dual-row planting.
Verbatim
e0“bud chip seedlings also performed well in dual row planting”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen at 150% of the recommended dose through fertigation produced 104.8 t ha -1 cane yield, significantly higher than 75% or 100% RDN.
Verbatim
e0“Application of nitrogen at 150% recommended dose through fertigation recorded significantly higher cane yield of 104.8 t ha -1 than 75% or 100% RDN.”
t0“Sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.