Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Production

Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions

M. El-Kersh; S. El-Meniawy; S. Abd El-Hady

9
claims
28
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was accomplished in a private farm at Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypt during the two successive spring-summer seasons of 2013 and 2014 to assess the effect of grafting methods and rootstocks on plant growth performance, fruit yield and fruit quality of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] cv. Peacock wm60. Peacock wm60 plants were grafted onto five rootstocks (6001 F1, Super Shintoza F1, Ferro F1, bottle gourd cv. Local, and Peacock wm60 as self-grafted) either by splice and tongue approach. Non-grafted plants of Peacock wm60 were used as control. Grafting methods pronounced non-significant impact on watermelon vegetative and root growth and fruit yield and quality after transplanting in the field (scope of our study). Based on the data, watermelon propagation via grafting on the rootstocks of 6001, Super Shintosa and Ferro positively impacted on plant growth attributes and fruit yield and quality (fruit weight, rind sickness and TSS content) compared to grafting on local rootstock, self-grafted or direct seed plants. Rootstock of 6001 appeared superior to others on enhancing the measured parameters of plant growth, yield and fruit quality as well as root growth (roots dry weight). Local rootstock of bottle gourd impacted poorly on plant growth, yield and fruit quality compared to other rootstocks but superior to self-grafted or direct seed plants. The data concluded that, choice grafting method either splice or tongue approach for production watermelon seedlings depends on their results in the nursery before planting the grafted seedlings in the field because of differences between the methods on the plant behavior after transplanting were absent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting method had a non-significant impact on watermelon vegetative and root growth after transplanting in the field.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
Peacock wm60e7
Treatment
Grafting methodse1
Outcome
vegetative and root growthe1
Direction
non-significant impacte1
Setting
in the fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting methods pronounced non-significant impact on watermelon vegetative and root growth and fruit yield and quality after transplanting in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–730 · show in text ↑
e7

“Peacock wm60 plants were grafted onto five rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting method had a non-significant impact on watermelon fruit yield and quality after transplanting in the field.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
Peacock wm60e7
Treatment
Grafting methodse1
Outcome
fruit yield and qualitye1
Direction
non-significant impacte1
Setting
in the fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting methods pronounced non-significant impact on watermelon vegetative and root growth and fruit yield and quality after transplanting in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–730 · show in text ↑
e7

“Peacock wm60 plants were grafted onto five rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on the rootstocks 6001, Super Shintosa and Ferro positively impacted watermelon plant growth attributes compared to local rootstock, self-grafted or direct seed plants.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
Peacock wm60e7
Treatment
grafting on the rootstocks of 6001, Super Shintosa and Ferroe2
Outcome
plant growth attributese2
Direction
positively impactede2
Comparator
local rootstock, self-grafted or direct seed plantse2
Setting
Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“watermelon propagation via grafting on the rootstocks of 6001, Super Shintosa and Ferro positively impacted on plant growth attributes and fruit yield and quality (fruit weight, rind sickness and TSS content) compared to grafting on local rootstock, self-grafted or direct seed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1056 · show in text ↑
e6

“in a private farm at Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–91 · show in text ↑
e7

“Peacock wm60 plants were grafted onto five rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on the rootstocks 6001, Super Shintosa and Ferro positively impacted watermelon fruit yield and quality compared to local rootstock, self-grafted or direct seed plants.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
Peacock wm60e7
Treatment
grafting on the rootstocks of 6001, Super Shintosa and Ferroe2
Outcome
fruit yield and qualitye2
Direction
positively impactede2
Qualifier
fruit weight, rind sickness and TSS contente2
Comparator
local rootstock, self-grafted or direct seed plantse2
Setting
Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“watermelon propagation via grafting on the rootstocks of 6001, Super Shintosa and Ferro positively impacted on plant growth attributes and fruit yield and quality (fruit weight, rind sickness and TSS content) compared to grafting on local rootstock, self-grafted or direct seed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1056 · show in text ↑
e6

“in a private farm at Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–91 · show in text ↑
e7

“Peacock wm60 plants were grafted onto five rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock 6001 was superior to other rootstocks for watermelon plant growth, yield and fruit quality.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Rootstock of 6001e3
Outcome
plant growth, yield and fruit qualitye3
Direction
superiore3
Comparator
otherse3
Setting
Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rootstock of 6001 appeared superior to others on enhancing the measured parameters of plant growth, yield and fruit quality as well as root growth (roots dry weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1223 · show in text ↑
e6

“in a private farm at Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock 6001 was superior to other rootstocks for watermelon root growth.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Rootstock of 6001e3
Outcome
root growthe3
Direction
superiore3
Qualifier
roots dry weighte3
Comparator
otherse3
Setting
Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rootstock of 6001 appeared superior to others on enhancing the measured parameters of plant growth, yield and fruit quality as well as root growth (roots dry weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1223 · show in text ↑
e6

“in a private farm at Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local bottle gourd rootstock impacted watermelon plant growth, yield and fruit quality poorly compared to other rootstocks.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Local rootstock of bottle gourde4
Outcome
plant growth, yield and fruit qualitye4
Direction
poorlye4
Comparator
other rootstockse4
Setting
Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e4

“Local rootstock of bottle gourd impacted poorly on plant growth, yield and fruit quality compared to other rootstocks but superior to self-grafted or direct seed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1393 · show in text ↑
e6

“in a private farm at Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local bottle gourd rootstock was superior to self-grafted or direct seed watermelon plants for growth, yield and fruit quality.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Local rootstock of bottle gourde4
Outcome
plant growth, yield and fruit qualitye4
Direction
superiore4
Comparator
self-grafted or direct seed plantse4
Setting
Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e4

“Local rootstock of bottle gourd impacted poorly on plant growth, yield and fruit quality compared to other rootstocks but superior to self-grafted or direct seed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1393 · show in text ↑
e6

“in a private farm at Al Salhia area, Sharqia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–91 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the choice between splice and tongue grafting for watermelon seedling production should depend on nursery results before field planting.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
splice or tongue approache5
Outcome
choice grafting methode5
Qualifier
depends on their results in the nurserye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Can Modulate Watermelon Growth and Productivity under Egyptian Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“The data concluded that, choice grafting method either splice or tongue approach for production watermelon seedlings depends on their results in the nursery before planting the grafted seedlings in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1602 · show in text ↑

Lagenaria siceraria · quality: grain · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

grafting · quality: general · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

grafting · quality: grain · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.