Paper · 2019 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

The effect of salt-tolerant antagonistic bacteria from tomato rhizosphere on plant growth promotion and damping-off disease suppression under salt-stress conditions

Thamodini Gaya Karunasinghe; Issa Hashil Al-Mahmooli; Abdullah Mohammed Al-Sadi; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A total of 24 morphologically distinct salt-tolerant bacteria were isolated from the tomato rhizosphere soil and tested in vitro against Pythium aphanidermatum, causing damping-off disease in tomato. Among them, five bacterial isolates viz., BTR1.0, BTR1.1, BTR4.4, BTR7.0 and BTR8.6 were found to inhibit the mycelial growth of P. aphanidermatum. The maximum antagonistic effect was shown by BTR1.0 followed by BTR7.0 and BTR1.1. Based on the MALDI Biotyper analysis, these bacterial isolates were identified as Serratia marcescens (BTR1.0 and BTR1.1), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (BTR7.0 and BTR8.6) and Alcaligenes faecalis (BTR4.4). Analysis of plant growth stimulating activity of bacterial strains revealed that A. faecalis BTR4.4 recorded the highest vigour index followed by S. marcescens BTR1.0. The biocontrol activity of bacterial antagonists against tomato damping-off was tested under salt-water irrigation. Among the bacterial strains tested, S. marcescens BTR1.1 was found to be highly effective under non-saline water irrigation, which suppressed the disease by 68% compared to infected control. However, at 50 mM NaCl concentration, S. marcescens strain BTR1.0, P. aeruginosa strain BTR7.0 and A. faecalis BTR4.4 provided a significant level of control of the disease. At 100 mM NaCl concentration, no significant effect of the bacterial strains on the disease incidence was observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five bacterial isolates inhibited Pythium aphanidermatum mycelial growth.

Interactor
P. aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatume0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth of P. aphanidermatume0
Direction
inhibite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“five bacterial isolates viz., BTR1.0, BTR1.1, BTR4.4, BTR7.0 and BTR8.6 were found to inhibit the mycelial growth of P. aphanidermatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTR1.0 had the maximum antagonistic effect, followed by BTR7.0 and BTR1.1.

Material
BTR1.0e0
Outcome
antagonistic effecte0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum antagonistic effect was shown by BTR1.0 followed by BTR7.0 and BTR1.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested antagonistic isolates were identified as Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Alcaligenes faecalis.

Outcome
bacterial isolates were identifiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these bacterial isolates were identified as Serratia marcescens (BTR1.0 and BTR1.1), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (BTR7.0 and BTR8.6) and Alcaligenes faecalis (BTR4.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcaligenes faecalis BTR4.4 produced the highest plant vigour index, followed by Serratia marcescens BTR1.0.

Interactor
A. faecalis BTR4.4Alcaligenes faecalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
vigour indexe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alcaligenes faecalis
Alcaligenes faecalis · InteractorCDC/ Dr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. faecalis BTR4.4 recorded the highest vigour index followed by S. marcescens BTR1.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia marcescens BTR1.1 suppressed tomato damping-off by 68% relative to infected control under non-saline irrigation.

Treatment
S. marcescens BTR1.1e0
Interactor
S. marcescens BTR1.1Serratia marcescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
68%e0
Qualifier
non-saline water irrigatione0
Comparator
infected controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia marcescens
Serratia marcescens · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. marcescens BTR1.1 was found to be highly effective under non-saline water irrigation, which suppressed the disease by 68% compared to infected control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia marcescens BTR1.0 significantly controlled disease at 50 mM NaCl.

Treatment
S. marcescens strain BTR1.0e0
Interactor
S. marcescens strain BTR1.0Serratia marcescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controle0
Qualifier
50 mM NaCl concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia marcescens
Serratia marcescens · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 50 mM NaCl concentration, S. marcescens strain BTR1.0, P. aeruginosa strain BTR7.0 and A. faecalis BTR4.4 provided a significant level of control of the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas aeruginosa BTR7.0 significantly controlled disease at 50 mM NaCl.

Treatment
P. aeruginosa strain BTR7.0e0
Interactor
P. aeruginosa strain BTR7.0Pseudomonas aeruginosae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controle0
Qualifier
50 mM NaCl concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 50 mM NaCl concentration, S. marcescens strain BTR1.0, P. aeruginosa strain BTR7.0 and A. faecalis BTR4.4 provided a significant level of control of the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcaligenes faecalis BTR4.4 significantly controlled disease at 50 mM NaCl.

Treatment
A. faecalis BTR4.4e0
Interactor
A. faecalis BTR4.4Alcaligenes faecalise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
controle0
Qualifier
50 mM NaCl concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alcaligenes faecalis
Alcaligenes faecalis · InteractorCDC/ Dr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 50 mM NaCl concentration, S. marcescens strain BTR1.0, P. aeruginosa strain BTR7.0 and A. faecalis BTR4.4 provided a significant level of control of the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial strains had no significant effect on disease incidence at 100 mM NaCl.

Treatment
bacterial strainse0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Qualifier
100 mM NaCl concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 100 mM NaCl concentration, no significant effect of the bacterial strains on the disease incidence was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1395 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑

Serratia marcescens · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Pseudomonas aeruginosa · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 136 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.