Paper · 2009 · Agritrop (Cirad)

Inheritance of components of resistance of cocoa to vegetative infection by Moniliophthora perniciosa evaluated through agar-droplet inoculations and correlations with field

Surendra Surujdeo-Maharaj; Pathmanathan Umaharan; Albertus Eskes; et al.

19
claims
42
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa, caused by Moniliophthora perniciosa, was investigated in 56 cross families. Twenty-four micro-grafted clones (16 parental and 8 control or reference clones) were also inoculated, including 16 parental clones representing various genetic groups. The clones and seedlings were tested for resistance to the disease using an optimised agar-droplet inoculation method in screen house experiments with plants of one-year-old, and by inoculating one bud per plant. For clones, three replicates of three plants each were used and for seedlings two replicates of 25 seedlings). Resistance components recorded on an individual plant basis were infection frequency (IF = % of swellings or brooms), broom frequency (BF, %), incubation period (IP, days to express first symptoms) and symptom severity (expressed as broombase diameter or BBD in mm). As expected from earlier work with the same type of agar-droplet inoculation method, average IF and BF were high. This allowed for better distinction among other post-penetration resistance parameters. Seedling BF was approximately 100%, whereas this parameter varied widely for clones (22 to 100%). Significant differences were observed among the clones and seedling progenies both for IP and BBD. For the clones, BBD was negatively correlated with IP (r = - 0.68) and positively correlated with IF (r = 0.62). IF and IP were not significantly correlated (r = - 0.22). For 14 clones tested in the screen houses, it was possible to compare the resistance components with field results (% vegetative infection). BBD was correlated with field levels of resistance (r = 0.71), whereas the correlation between IF and field resistance was lower (r = 0.42), though still significant. IP was not correlated with field results (r = - 0.16). These results clearly show that BBD is an important trait to be used in selection for WB resistance. There was a strong linear relationship between mid parental values and progeny means for BBD (r2 = 0.85) and for IP (r2 = 0.78), indicating strong heritability and additive effects. The strong additive effects were also confirmed for the combined NCII design analyses, whereas the effect of dominance was not significant. The variation for IP and BBD within cross progenies was continuous and normally distributed, including for the progenies of SCA 6, suggesting that resistance in vegetative tissue to WB is polygenic in nature. The presence of transgressive segregation within many seedling families augurs well for the possibility to accumulate genes for resistance by individual plant selection within crosses among resistant parents, (50% of the parental clones had been chosen because of their known levels of resistance to WB). It is recognised that variations in host, pathogen and environmental factors all may variously affect the repeatability of resistance testing. Precautions to be taken when using the agar-drop method in both seedlings and in clones are outlined. The implications of the findings on breeding of cocoa aiming at combining good yield with high levels of resistance to witches' broom are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones and seedling progenies differed significantly in incubation period and broombase diameter.

Material
clones and seedling progeniese1
Outcome
IP and BBDe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant differences were observed among the clones and seedling progenies both for IP and BBD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1285 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average infection frequency and broom frequency were high in the agar-droplet test.

Outcome
average IF and BFe1
Qualifier
were highe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“average IF and BF were high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1000 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling broom frequency was approximately 100%.

Outcome
Seedling BFe1
Value
approximately 100%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedling BF was approximately 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broom frequency varied widely among clones, from 22 to 100%.

Material
clonese1
Outcome
BFe1
Value
22 to 100%e1
Qualifier
varied widelye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedling BF was approximately 100%, whereas this parameter varied widely for clones (22 to 100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1186 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broombase diameter was negatively correlated with incubation period among clones (r = -0.68).

Material
clonese1
Outcome
BBDe1
Direction
negatively correlatede1
Value
r = - 0.68e1
Qualifier
with IPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“For the clones, BBD was negatively correlated with IP (r = - 0.68) and positively correlated with IF (r = 0.62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1398 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broombase diameter was positively correlated with infection frequency among clones (r = 0.62).

Material
clonese1
Outcome
BBDe1
Direction
positively correlatede1
Value
r = 0.62e1
Qualifier
with IFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“For the clones, BBD was negatively correlated with IP (r = - 0.68) and positively correlated with IF (r = 0.62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1398 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection frequency and incubation period were not significantly correlated (r = -0.22).

Material
clonese1
Outcome
IF and IPe2
Direction
not significantly correlatede2
Value
r = - 0.22e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“For the clones, BBD was negatively correlated with IP (r = - 0.68) and positively correlated with IF (r = 0.62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1398 · show in text ↑
e2

“IF and IP were not significantly correlated (r = - 0.22)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1456 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broombase diameter was correlated with field levels of resistance (r = 0.71) for 14 clones in screen houses.

Material
14 clonese1
Outcome
BBDe2
Value
r = 0.71e2
Qualifier
with field levels of resistancee2
Setting
screen housese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“For 14 clones tested in the screen houses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1499 · show in text ↑
e2

“BBD was correlated with field levels of resistance (r = 0.71)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1660 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The correlation between infection frequency and field resistance was lower (r = 0.42) but still significant.

Material
14 clonese1
Outcome
correlation between IF and field resistancee2
Direction
lowere2
Value
r = 0.42e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“For 14 clones tested in the screen houses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1499 · show in text ↑
e2

“the correlation between IF and field resistance was lower (r = 0.42), though still significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1764 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incubation period was not correlated with field results (r = -0.16) for 14 clones.

Material
14 clonese1
Outcome
IPe2
Direction
not correlatede2
Value
r = - 0.16e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“For 14 clones tested in the screen houses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1499 · show in text ↑
e2

“IP was not correlated with field results (r = - 0.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1819 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-parental values showed a strong linear relationship with progeny means for broombase diameter (r2 = 0.85).

Outcome
progeny means for BBDe1
Value
r2 = 0.85e1
Qualifier
indicating strong heritability and additive effectse1
Comparator
mid parental valuese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a strong linear relationship between mid parental values and progeny means for BBD (r2 = 0.85) and for IP (r2 = 0.78), indicating strong heritability and additive effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-parental values showed a strong linear relationship with progeny means for incubation period (r2 = 0.78).

Outcome
IPe1
Value
r2 = 0.78e1
Qualifier
indicating strong heritability and additive effectse1
Comparator
mid parental valuese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a strong linear relationship between mid parental values and progeny means for BBD (r2 = 0.85) and for IP (r2 = 0.78), indicating strong heritability and additive effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additive effects were confirmed in the combined NCII design analyses.

Outcome
additive effectse1
Qualifier
combined NCII design analysese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“The strong additive effects were also confirmed for the combined NCII design analyses, whereas the effect of dominance was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2104–2242 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of dominance was not significant in the combined NCII design analyses.

Outcome
effect of dominancee1
Qualifier
combined NCII design analysese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“The strong additive effects were also confirmed for the combined NCII design analyses, whereas the effect of dominance was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2104–2242 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variation for IP and BBD within cross progenies was continuous and normally distributed.

Material
cross progeniese1
Outcome
variation for IP and BBDe1
Qualifier
continuous and normally distributede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“The variation for IP and BBD within cross progenies was continuous and normally distributed, including for the progenies of SCA 6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2244–2373 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance in vegetative tissue to witches' broom is polygenic in nature.

Outcome
resistance in vegetative tissue to WBe1
Qualifier
polygenic in naturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“suggesting that resistance in vegetative tissue to WB is polygenic in nature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2375–2451 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transgressive segregation is present within many seedling families.

Material
seedling familiese1
Outcome
transgressive segregatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“The presence of transgressive segregation within many seedling families augurs well for the possibility to accumulate genes for resistance by individual plant selection within crosses among resistant parents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2453–2660 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Individual plant selection within crosses among resistant parents is suggested to accumulate resistance genes.

Outcome
individual plant selection within crosses among resistant parentse1
Qualifier
to accumulate genes for resistancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“The presence of transgressive segregation within many seedling families augurs well for the possibility to accumulate genes for resistance by individual plant selection within crosses among resistant parents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2453–2660 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Broombase diameter is an important trait for selection for witches' broom resistance.

Outcome
selection for WB resistancee1
Qualifier
BBD is an important traite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance to witches' broom disease (WB) in cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results clearly show that BBD is an important trait to be used in selection for WB resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1920 · show in text ↑