Paper · 2019 · Agronomy Journal

Ameliorative Effects of Jasmonic Acid and Humic Acid on Antioxidant Enzymes and Salt Tolerance of Forage Sorghum under Salinity Conditions

Adam Yousif Adam Ali; Muhi Eldeen Hussien Ibrahim; Guisheng Zhou; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Salinity is one of the most important factors that reduce the growth and antioxidant defense of plants. A controlled pot experiment was conducted to investigate the ameliorative effects of jasmonic acid (JA) priming (0, 5, and 10 mM) and humic acid (HA) (0, 3, and 6 g HA kg −1 soil) amendment on antioxidant enzymes and salt tolerance of forage sorghum seedling ( Sorghum bicolor L.) grown under three salinity conditions (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl). Salinity stress reduced emergence seedling index (ESI), promptness index (PI), emergence stress tolerance index (ESTI), dry weight stress tolerance index (DWSTI), and the activities of the peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) enzymes. The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content increased with salinity. Application of JA positively affected all parameters except CAT and MDA. Humic acid significantly increased all measured parameters except ESTI, DWSTI, and SOD activity. At the 200 mM NaCl level, JA and HA increased CAT, POD, SOD, ESI, DWSTI, ESTI, PI, and MDA as compared with the control. The application of HA at 6 g kg −1 soil decreased SOD and ESI relative to the control at high salinity. The application of 10 mM JA combined with HA at 6 g kg −1 soil was most effective in alleviating salinity stress. Therefore, the combined application of JA and HA on forage sorghum may improve salt tolerance and increase antioxidant enzymes that alleviate damages caused by salinity stress. Core Ideas Application of jasmonic acid and humic acid (HA) mitigated salinity stress. Jasmonic acid (JA) and HA increased the antioxidant enzymes. Applying a combination of JA and HA at high levels of salinity improved salt tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced sorghum emergence indices.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
Salinity stresse0
Outcome
emergence seedling index (ESI), promptness index (PI), emergence stress tolerance index (ESTI)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress reduced emergence seedling index (ESI), promptness index (PI), emergence stress tolerance index (ESTI), dry weight stress tolerance index (DWSTI), and the activities of the peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) enzymes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced dry weight tolerance and antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
Salinity stresse0
Outcome
dry weight stress tolerance index (DWSTI), and the activities of the peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) enzymese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress reduced emergence seedling index (ESI), promptness index (PI), emergence stress tolerance index (ESTI), dry weight stress tolerance index (DWSTI), and the activities of the peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) enzymes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD activity and MDA content rose with salinity.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content increased with salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JA positively affected parameters other than CAT and MDA.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
all parameters except CAT and MDAe0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of JA positively affected all parameters except CAT and MDA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased parameters other than ESTI, DWSTI and SOD activity.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
Humic acide0
Outcome
all measured parameters except ESTI, DWSTI, and SOD activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acid significantly increased all measured parameters except ESTI, DWSTI, and SOD activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JA increased CAT, POD, SOD at 200 mM NaCl versus control.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
CAT, POD, SODe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
200 mM NaCle0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“At the 200 mM NaCl level, JA and HA increased CAT, POD, SOD, ESI, DWSTI, ESTI, PI, and MDA as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA increased CAT, POD, SOD at 200 mM NaCl versus control.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
HAe0
Outcome
CAT, POD, SODe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
200 mM NaCle0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“At the 200 mM NaCl level, JA and HA increased CAT, POD, SOD, ESI, DWSTI, ESTI, PI, and MDA as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JA increased ESI, DWSTI, ESTI, PI, and MDA at 200 mM NaCl versus control.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
ESI, DWSTI, ESTI, PI, and MDAe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
200 mM NaCle0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“At the 200 mM NaCl level, JA and HA increased CAT, POD, SOD, ESI, DWSTI, ESTI, PI, and MDA as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA increased ESI, DWSTI, ESTI, PI, and MDA at 200 mM NaCl versus control.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
HAe0
Outcome
ESI, DWSTI, ESTI, PI, and MDAe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
200 mM NaCle0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“At the 200 mM NaCl level, JA and HA increased CAT, POD, SOD, ESI, DWSTI, ESTI, PI, and MDA as compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA at 6 g kg −1 soil decreased SOD and ESI under high salinity.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
HA at 6 g kg −1 soile0
Outcome
SOD and ESIe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
high salinitye0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of HA at 6 g kg −1 soil decreased SOD and ESI relative to the control at high salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined high dose was most effective in alleviating salinity stress.

Taxon
Forage Sorghumt0
Treatment
10 mM JA combined with HA at 6 g kg −1 soile0
Outcome
alleviating salinity stresse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 10 mM JA combined with HA at 6 g kg −1 soil was most effective in alleviating salinity stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑

jasmonic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · growth · SorghumResults differ

89 papers: 11 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

other · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · tolerance: abiotic · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.