Paper · 2019 · Technical Sciences

Application of sonication and freezing as initial treatments before microwave-vacuum drying of cranberries

Izabela Staniszewska; Szymon Staszyński; Magdalena Zielińska

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of study was to determine the influence of sonication and freezing on the kinetic of the microwave-vacuum drying, energy consumption and physical properties of whole cranberries as well as evaluate the applicability of sonication instead of freezing in order to change their physical properties and the drying kinetic of whole cranberries. Microwave-vacuum drying of whole cranberries with/without initial treatments took from 12 ± 1 to 14.5 ± 0.5 minutes. All of treatments did not significantly shorten the drying time of cranberries. However, they increased SMER values even by 31%. Despite of cryogenic freezing, all of treatments significantly increased the values of Dew. Sonication combined with drying allowed to obtain dried berries characterized by the lowest cohesiveness (0.19±0.02), springiness (0.62±0.02) and chewiness (3.4±0.8 N), while cryogenic freezing combined with drying allowed to obtain dried fruits characterized by highest springiness (0.75±0.03) and low chewiness (3.3±0.5 N). The highest lightness (32.2±0.7), redness (32.6±0.8), and yellowness (11.1±0.7) were found for fruits subjected to initial convective freezing before drying. The efficiency of sonication in color change was comparable to cryogenic freezing and much lower than convective freezing. All of initial treatments increased such thermal properties of dried cranberries as thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave-vacuum drying took 12 ± 1 to 14.5 ± 0.5 minutes across treatments.

Taxon
cranberriese0
Treatment
with/without initial treatmentse0
Outcome
Microwave-vacuum dryinge0
Value
12 ± 1 to 14.5 ± 0.5 minutese0

Verbatim

e0

“Microwave-vacuum drying of whole cranberries with/without initial treatments took from 12 ± 1 to 14.5 ± 0.5 minutes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial treatments did not significantly shorten cranberry drying time.

Taxon
cranberriese0
Treatment
All of treatmentse0
Outcome
drying timee0
Direction
did not significantly shortene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All of treatments did not significantly shorten the drying time of cranberries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial treatments increased SMER by up to 31%.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
initial treatmentse1
Outcome
SMER valuese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“they increased SMER values even by 31%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–593 · show in text ↑
e1

“with/without initial treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial treatments other than cryogenic freezing significantly increased Dew.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
all of treatmentse0
Outcome
values of Dewe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Despite of cryogenic freezinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Despite of cryogenic freezing, all of treatments significantly increased the values of Dew.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sonication and drying gave dried berries the lowest cohesiveness, 0.19±0.02.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
Sonication combined with dryinge0
Outcome
cohesivenesse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.19±0.02e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sonication combined with drying allowed to obtain dried berries characterized by the lowest cohesiveness (0.19±0.02)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sonication and drying gave dried berries the lowest springiness, 0.62±0.02.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
Sonication combined with dryinge1
Outcome
springinesse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.62±0.02e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lowest cohesiveness (0.19±0.02), springiness (0.62±0.02) and chewiness (3.4±0.8 N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sonication combined with drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sonication and drying gave dried berries the lowest chewiness, 3.4±0.8 N.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
Sonication combined with dryinge1
Outcome
chewinesse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.4±0.8 Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lowest cohesiveness (0.19±0.02), springiness (0.62±0.02) and chewiness (3.4±0.8 N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sonication combined with drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryogenic freezing and drying gave dried fruit the highest springiness, 0.75±0.03.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
cryogenic freezing combined with dryinge0
Outcome
springinesse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.75±0.03e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cryogenic freezing combined with drying allowed to obtain dried fruits characterized by highest springiness (0.75±0.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryogenic freezing and drying gave dried fruit low chewiness, 3.3±0.5 N.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
cryogenic freezing combined with dryinge0
Outcome
chewinesse0
Direction
lowe0
Value
3.3±0.5 Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cryogenic freezing combined with drying allowed to obtain dried fruits characterized by highest springiness (0.75±0.03) and low chewiness (3.3±0.5 N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convective freezing before drying produced the highest fruit lightness, 32.2±0.7.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
initial convective freezing before dryinge0
Outcome
lightnesse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
32.2±0.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest lightness (32.2±0.7), redness (32.6±0.8), and yellowness (11.1±0.7) were found for fruits subjected to initial convective freezing before drying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convective freezing before drying produced the highest fruit redness, 32.6±0.8.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
initial convective freezing before dryinge0
Outcome
rednesse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
32.6±0.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest lightness (32.2±0.7), redness (32.6±0.8), and yellowness (11.1±0.7) were found for fruits subjected to initial convective freezing before drying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convective freezing before drying produced the highest fruit yellowness, 11.1±0.7.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
initial convective freezing before dryinge0
Outcome
yellownesse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.1±0.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest lightness (32.2±0.7), redness (32.6±0.8), and yellowness (11.1±0.7) were found for fruits subjected to initial convective freezing before drying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sonication changed color about as effectively as cryogenic freezing, but much less effectively than convective freezing.

Taxon
cranberriest0
Treatment
sonicatione0
Outcome
efficiency of sonication in color changee0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
much lower than convective freezinge0
Comparator
cryogenic freezinge0

Verbatim

e0

“The efficiency of sonication in color change was comparable to cryogenic freezing and much lower than convective freezing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“cranberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All initial treatments increased dried cranberry thermal conductivity and diffusivity.

Taxon
cranberriese0
Treatment
All of initial treatmentse0
Outcome
thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All of initial treatments increased such thermal properties of dried cranberries as thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1422 · show in text ↑