Paper · 2011 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

INFLUENCE OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS ON SOIL NUTRIENTS AVAILABILITY AND WHEAT PRODUCTIVITY.

S. A. Hammad; H. A. Meshref; T. M. El-Zehery; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soils degraded physically and nutritionally due to continuous use of chemical fertilizers under intensive agricultural. Management of N is the key for sustainable and profitable wheat production in a low N-soil availability. So a field experiment was conducted on a clay soil using wheat (Triticum aestivum) Giza 168 variety during 2008 / 2009 season at Agricultural Experimental Station of Fac. Agric, Mansoura Univ., to study the influence of combined use of mineral fertilizers (urea) and organic fertilizers in the form of farmyard manure (FYM), composted rice straw (CRS) and their combinations on wheat productivity, nutrients availability and monitoring soil organic matter (SOM) status in soil at certain times 45, 88 and 155 days from wheat planting. The randomize complete blocks design with three replications was used. The mineral fertilizer (urea) was applied at the rate of N1=60 and N2=120 kg urea fed-1.The amounts of various organic fertilizers used were (10 and 20 m3 fed-1), for both FYM and CRS. Organic fertilizers added either alone or in combinations with urea to the soil. Results indicated that the maximum increase in grain yield (54.66 and 56.55 % over untreated control) and straw yield (1660.50 and 1710.99 g.m2) were recorded with N2FYM2 and N2CRS2 respectively. All combination of organic (FYM or CRS) and inorganic fertilizers gave the optimum availability of NH4+, NO3-, P, K concentration in soil beside the enhancement of soil organic matter percentage (SOM) as compared to the other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2FYM2 produced a maximum grain yield increase of 54.66% over untreated control.

Treatment
N2FYM2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
54.66e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum increase in grain yield (54.66 and 56.55 % over untreated control) and straw yield (1660.50 and 1710.99 g.m2) were recorded with N2FYM2 and N2CRS2 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2CRS2 produced a maximum grain yield increase of 56.55% over untreated control.

Treatment
N2CRS2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
56.55 %e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum increase in grain yield (54.66 and 56.55 % over untreated control) and straw yield (1660.50 and 1710.99 g.m2) were recorded with N2FYM2 and N2CRS2 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2FYM2 produced straw yield of 1660.50 g.m2.

Treatment
N2FYM2e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Value
1660.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (1660.50 and 1710.99 g.m2) were recorded with N2FYM2 and N2CRS2 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2CRS2 produced straw yield of 1710.99 g.m2.

Treatment
N2CRS2e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Value
1710.99 g.m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield (1660.50 and 1710.99 g.m2) were recorded with N2FYM2 and N2CRS2 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic and inorganic fertilizers optimized soil NH4+, NO3-, P and K availability relative to other treatments.

Treatment
combination of organic (FYM or CRS) and inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
availability of NH4+, NO3-, P, K concentration in soile0
Direction
optimume0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All combination of organic (FYM or CRS) and inorganic fertilizers gave the optimum availability of NH4+, NO3-, P, K concentration in soil beside the enhancement of soil organic matter percentage (SOM) as compared to the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic and inorganic fertilizers enhanced soil organic matter percentage relative to other treatments.

Treatment
combination of organic (FYM or CRS) and inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil organic matter percentage (SOM)e0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All combination of organic (FYM or CRS) and inorganic fertilizers gave the optimum availability of NH4+, NO3-, P, K concentration in soil beside the enhancement of soil organic matter percentage (SOM) as compared to the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Oryza sativa · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.