Abstract
Abstract Effectiveness of sesame intercropping in mungbean for the management of flower thrips and pod borer of mungbean was studied at Pulses Research Centre, Ishurdi, Pabna, Bangladesh, during two consecutive season of kharif-I 2017 and 2018. Sesame intercropping in mungbean reduced flower thrips infestation and pod borer infestation significantly in both the years. Among the intercropped treatments, mungbean: sesame at 2:2 row ratio arrangements was found the best intercropping arrangements in reducing flower thrips and pod borer infestation. Sesame intercropping showed statistically similar performance in reducing pod borer infestation, as like as insecticide spraying (Imitaf 20 SL @ 0.5 ml/l). Mungbean equivalent yield varied depending on the prevailing weather condition of the cropping season and market prices of both mungbean and sesame, but the total production was always higher in intercropped treatments than sole cropping of mungbean. Hence, sesame intercropping in mungbean might be eco-friendly management approach against flower thrips and pod borers of mungbean providing higher production and benefit.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Sesame intercropping significantly reduced flower thrips infestation in both years.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- Sesame intercroppinge0
- Interactor
- flower thripse0pest
- Outcome
- flower thrips infestatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Sesame intercropping in mungbean reduced flower thrips infestation and pod borer infestation significantly in both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Sesame intercropping significantly reduced pod borer infestation in both years.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Sesame intercroppinge0
- Interactor
- pod borere0pest
- Outcome
- pod borer infestatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sesame intercropping in mungbean reduced flower thrips infestation and pod borer infestation significantly in both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
A 2:2 mungbean to sesame row ratio was the best intercropping arrangement for reducing flower thrips and pod borer infestation.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- mungbean: sesame at 2:2 row ratio arrangementse0
- Outcome
- flower thrips and pod borer infestatione0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mungbean: sesame at 2:2 row ratio arrangements was found the best intercropping arrangements in reducing flower thrips and pod borer infestation”
Claim · model-written summary
Sesame intercropping and Imitaf spraying had statistically similar performance against pod borer infestation.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Sesame intercroppinge0
- Interactor
- pod borere0pest
- Outcome
- pod borer infestatione0
- Direction
- statistically similare0
- Comparator
- insecticide spraying (Imitaf 20 SL @ 0.5 ml/l)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sesame intercropping showed statistically similar performance in reducing pod borer infestation, as like as insecticide spraying (Imitaf 20 SL @ 0.5 ml/l)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Mungbean equivalent yield varied with seasonal weather and market prices.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Outcome
- equivalent yielde0
- Qualifier
- prevailing weather condition of the cropping season and market prices of both mungbean and sesamee0
- Setting
- cropping seasone0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mungbean equivalent yield varied depending on the prevailing weather condition of the cropping season and market prices of both mungbean and sesame”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped treatments had higher total production than sole mungbean cropping.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- intercropped treatmentse0
- Outcome
- total productione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- sole cropping of mungbeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the total production was always higher in intercropped treatments than sole cropping of mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest sesame intercropping as an eco-friendly approach against mungbean flower thrips and pod borers.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Interactor
- flower thripse0pest
- Outcome
- eco-friendly management approach against flower thrips and pod borers of mungbeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sesame intercropping in mungbean might be eco-friendly management approach against flower thrips and pod borers of mungbean providing higher production and benefit”
The same questions in other papers
Sesamum indicum · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →intercropping · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.