Paper · 2019 · Plant Cell & Environment

Elevated [CO2] alleviates the impacts of water deficit on xylem anatomy and hydraulic properties of maize stems

Junzhou Liu; Shaozhong Kang; William J. Davies; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Plants can modify xylem anatomy and hydraulic properties to adjust to water status. Elevated [CO 2 ] can increase plant water potential via reduced stomatal conductance and water loss. This raises the question of whether elevated [CO 2 ], which thus improves plant water status, will reduce the impacts of soil water deficit on xylem anatomy and hydraulic properties of plants. To analyse the impacts of water and [CO 2 ] on maize stem xylem anatomy and hydraulic properties, we exposed potted maize plants to varying [CO 2 ] levels (400, 700, 900, and 1,200 ppm) and water levels (full irrigation and deficit irrigation). Results showed that at current [CO 2 ], vessel diameter, vessel roundness, stem cross‐section area, specific hydraulic conductivity, and vulnerability to embolism decreased under deficit irrigation; yet, these impacts of deficit irrigation were reduced at elevated [CO 2 ]. Across all treatments, midday stem water potential was tightly correlated with xylem traits and displayed similar responses. A distinct trade‐off between efficiency and safety in stem xylem water transportation in response to water deficit was observed at current [CO 2 ] but not observed at elevated [CO 2 ]. The results of this study enhance our knowledge of plant hydraulic acclimation under future climate environments and provide insights into trade‐offs in xylem structure and function.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased maize vessel diameter, vessel roundness and stem cross-section area at current CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
vessel diameter, vessel roundness, stem cross‐section areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
at current [CO 2 ]e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at current [CO 2 ], vessel diameter, vessel roundness, stem cross‐section area, specific hydraulic conductivity, and vulnerability to embolism decreased under deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased specific hydraulic conductivity at current CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
specific hydraulic conductivitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at current [CO 2 ], vessel diameter, vessel roundness, stem cross‐section area, specific hydraulic conductivity, and vulnerability to embolism decreased under deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased vulnerability to embolism at current CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
vulnerability to embolisme0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at current [CO 2 ], vessel diameter, vessel roundness, stem cross‐section area, specific hydraulic conductivity, and vulnerability to embolism decreased under deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced deficit irrigation effects on xylem traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
elevated [CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
impacts of deficit irrigatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
deficit irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these impacts of deficit irrigation were reduced at elevated [CO 2 ]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Midday stem water potential was tightly correlated with xylem traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
midday stem water potentiale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“midday stem water potential was tightly correlated with xylem traits and displayed similar responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The efficiency-safety tradeoff in stem xylem water transport occurred under deficit at current CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
trade‐off between efficiency and safety in stem xylem water transportatione0
Qualifier
at current [CO 2 ]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A distinct trade‐off between efficiency and safety in stem xylem water transportation in response to water deficit was observed at current [CO 2 ]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The efficiency-safety tradeoff was absent at elevated CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
not observede0
Qualifier
elevated [CO 2 ]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not observed at elevated [CO 2 ]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 47 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

289 papers: 208 positive, 81 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

285 papers more in this group

See all 289 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.