Paper · 2018 · Journal of Applied Plant Protection

Effect of Propagation Methods and Sowing Dates on Aphid Infestation and Flower Heads Characters in Globe Artichoke Plants

Fadel, A. M. M. S. Hayam

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of three methods of propagation of globe artichoke; crown pieces, off-shoots & ovoli and three planting dates on aphid infestation, mainly (Aphis fabae L, A. gossypii Glov., Macrosiphum euphorbiae T., M. solani (Kalt.), and Myzus persicae (Sulzer) in the field in relation with flower head characters. Planting was carried out on July 20th, 10th and 31st of August during 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasons as early, ordinary and late dates of sowing, using the abovementioned three methods, at Shubramunt Village, Giza. Results showed significant differences among the weekly mean numbers of aphid as affected by the three tested methods of planting at the three tested sowing dates. Aphid infestations were generally low or moderate on G. artichoke when using the crown pieces comparing with the other two tested methods in both seasons under the three tested sowing dates. The lowest infestation observed with the normal date, especially by using crown pieces. As for flower head characters, results showed that neither propagation methods nor dates of sowing had significant effect on the average diameter or length of the formed head in both seasons. Also, using crown pieces gave significant increase in number and weight in flower heads compared to the other two tested methods. The greatest number of heads/ plant associated with the early date of planting, while its greatest weight correlated with the normal planting date under the three tested methods of propagation during the two studied seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Globe artichoke propagated from crown pieces had generally low or moderate aphid infestation compared with the other two methods.

Treatment
crown piecese1
Interactor
Aphide1pest
Outcome
Aphid infestationse1
Direction
lowe1
Comparator
the other two tested methodse1
Setting
Shubramunt Village, Gizae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“at Shubramunt Village, Giza”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–563 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aphid infestations were generally low or moderate on G. artichoke when using the crown pieces comparing with the other two tested methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest aphid infestation was observed with the normal sowing date, especially with crown pieces.

Treatment
normal datee2
Interactor
Aphide1pest
Outcome
infestatione2
Direction
loweste2
Qualifier
especially by using crown piecese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aphid infestations were generally low or moderate on G. artichoke when using the crown pieces comparing with the other two tested methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–866 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest infestation observed with the normal date, especially by using crown pieces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1006 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown pieces significantly increased the number and weight of flower heads compared with the other two methods.

Treatment
crown piecese3
Outcome
number and weight in flower headse3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
the other two tested methodse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“using crown pieces gave significant increase in number and weight in flower heads compared to the other two tested methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Propagation methods had no significant effect on the average diameter or length of flower heads.

Treatment
propagation methodse4
Outcome
average diameter or length of the formed heade4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“neither propagation methods nor dates of sowing had significant effect on the average diameter or length of the formed head”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The early planting date gave the greatest number of heads per plant.

Treatment
early date of plantinge5
Outcome
number of heads/ plante5
Direction
greateste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e5

“The greatest number of heads/ plant associated with the early date of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The normal planting date gave the greatest flower head weight.

Treatment
normal planting datee6
Outcome
weighte6
Direction
greateste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus
Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus · Taxon · picture of the speciesBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Globe Artichoke Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–121 · show in text ↑
e6

“its greatest weight correlated with the normal planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1476 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · Cynara cardunculus (cardoon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sowing time · yield · Cynara cardunculus (cardoon)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.