Paper · 2019 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Evaluation the Effect of N Mineral Fertilization in Combination with N Bio-Fertilizer on Barley Yield and its Components in Sandy Soil

أشرف عویس

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The current work aimed to elucidate the effect of N mineral fertilization rates in combination with N bio-fertilizer source and its rate on barley yield (Hordeum vulgare L.) var. Giza 2000 and its components in sandy soil. Afield experiment was conducted at Kantra Shark, north Sinai Governorate during 2017/2018 winter season using randomized complete block design with split split plot arrangements replicated three times. The main plots assigned to four mineral - N rates (0.0, 50, 75 and 100 kg N fed-1) as ammonium sulphate (205g N kg-1). The sub plots occupied by two commercial bio-fertilizer sources, Cyrialine and Microbine. The sub-sub plots dedicated to three bio-fertilizer rates (0.0,400,600 and 800 g fed-1). The results appeared that barley grain, straw and biological yields, harvest index(HI), grains protein content (%), N, P , K-uptake (kg fed-1) by grains or straw , total uptake (grains + straw) , agronomical and recovery (P and K) use efficiencies increased significantly with increasing N-fertilizer rate up to 100 kg fed-1.Agronomical, recovery nitrogen use efficiencies and physiological (N,P and K ) use efficiencies decreased significantly with increasing N-fertilizer rate. Cyrialine was superior to Microbine in its beneficial effect on most abovementioned traits. All studdedvegetative characters as well as chemical composition, nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiency increased significantly with increasing bio-fertilizer rate. Generally, although the crop responsed to mineral N rates up to 100kg N fed-1 under the studied soil (sandy), the combination application with bio-fertilizers was the best for all studied parameters and can save approximately 25 % of mineral N fertilizer at least as well as help in reducing mineral fertilizer pollution in growth media.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mineral nitrogen to 100 kg per feddan significantly increased grain, straw and biological yields and harvest index.

Treatment
increasing N-fertilizer rate up to 100 kg fed-1e0
Outcome
barley grain, straw and biological yields, harvest index(HI)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain, straw and biological yields, harvest index(HI), grains protein content (%), N, P , K-uptake (kg fed-1) by grains or straw , total uptake (grains + straw) , agronomical and recovery (P and K) use efficiencies increased significantly with increasing N-fertilizer rate up to 100 kg fed-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mineral nitrogen significantly increased grain protein and nutrient uptake.

Treatment
increasing N-fertilizer rate up to 100 kg fed-1e0
Outcome
grains protein content (%), N, P , K-uptake (kg fed-1)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain, straw and biological yields, harvest index(HI), grains protein content (%), N, P , K-uptake (kg fed-1) by grains or straw , total uptake (grains + straw) , agronomical and recovery (P and K) use efficiencies increased significantly with increasing N-fertilizer rate up to 100 kg fed-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mineral nitrogen significantly increased agronomic and recovery efficiencies for phosphorus and potassium.

Treatment
increasing N-fertilizer rate up to 100 kg fed-1e0
Outcome
agronomical and recovery (P and K) use efficienciese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain, straw and biological yields, harvest index(HI), grains protein content (%), N, P , K-uptake (kg fed-1) by grains or straw , total uptake (grains + straw) , agronomical and recovery (P and K) use efficiencies increased significantly with increasing N-fertilizer rate up to 100 kg fed-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher mineral nitrogen significantly lowered nitrogen agronomic and recovery efficiency and N, P and K physiological efficiency.

Treatment
increasing N-fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
Agronomical, recovery nitrogen use efficiencies and physiological (N,P and K ) use efficienciese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Agronomical, recovery nitrogen use efficiencies and physiological (N,P and K ) use efficiencies decreased significantly with increasing N-fertilizer rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyrialine outperformed Microbine on most reported traits.

Treatment
Cyrialinee0
Outcome
beneficial effect on most abovementioned traitse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Microbinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cyrialine was superior to Microbine in its beneficial effect on most abovementioned traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing biofertilizer rate significantly increased vegetative traits, composition, nutrient uptake and nutrient efficiency.

Treatment
increasing bio-fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
studdedvegetative characters as well as chemical composition, nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“All studdedvegetative characters as well as chemical composition, nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiency increased significantly with increasing bio-fertilizer rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1464 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biofertilizer application could save approximately 25% of mineral nitrogen.

Treatment
combination application with bio-fertilizerse0
Outcome
save approximately 25 % of mineral N fertilizere0
Value
25 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Barley Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“combination application with bio-fertilizers was the best for all studied parameters and can save approximately 25 % of mineral N fertilizer at least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1729 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: general · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 66 positive, 6 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

299 papers: 252 positive, 47 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

295 papers more in this group

See all 299 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.