Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculation reduced Larker yield and malt quality more than Dickson.

A claim from Effect of Inoculations with Cochliobolus sativus at Specific Growth Stages on Grain Yield and Quality of Malting Barley1 · 1985

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced Larker yield and malt quality more than Dickson.

Material
Larkere0
Treatment
Inoculations with Cochliobolus sativuse0
Interactor
Cochliobolus sativusBipolaris sorokinianae0pathogen
Outcome
yield, yield components, and malt qualitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
Dicksone0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations with Cochliobolus sativus reduced yield, yield components, and malt quality of Larker more than Dickson”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–708
t0

“barley”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 113–119

Title

Effect of Inoculations with Cochliobolus sativus at Specific Growth Stages on Grain Yield and Quality of Malting Barley1

F. W. Nutter; V. D. Pederson; A. E. Foster Crop Science 1985. doi:10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183x002500060008x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e8a20279a7c8ebab45d7b6a3fe6e7ee4dc5eee968553a3768aa228c6979c92e9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · quality: general · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.