Paper · 2014 · Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University AVESIS

Rhizobacteria for reduced fertilizer inputs in wheat Triticum aestivum spp vulgare and barley Hordeum vulgare on Aridisols in Turkey

Şahin, Fikrettin; Güllüce, Medine; Turan, Metin; et al.

16
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study assessed the effect of seed inoculation with single or multipleplant growth-promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) strains on yield in spring wheat(Triticum aestivum spp. vulgare var. Kırık) and barley (Hordeum vulgare cv. Tokak)plants in both greenhouse and field conditions during the years 2007 and 2008. Thetreatments of wheat and barley plants during the first year included: (1) Control(no inoculation and no fertilizer), (2) Bacillus OSU-142 (B.OSU-142), (3) Bacillusmegaterium M3 (B. megaterium M3), (4) Azospirillum brasilense Sp.245 (A. brasilenseSp.245), (5) Mixed 1 (B.OSU-142 + Bacillus M3 + Azospirillum AB-245),(6) Bacillus megaterium RC07 (B. megaterium RC07), (7) Paenibacillus polymyxaRC05, (8) Bacillus licheniformis RC08, (9) mineral nitrogen N1 (80 kg N ha-1) and(10) N2 (40 kg N ha-1in the form of urea). In the second year treatments were:(1) Raoutella terrigena (R. Terrigena), (2) Burkholderia cepacia FS Tur(B. cepacia FS Tur), (3) B. OSU-142 ARM, (4) B. M3 ARM, (5) A. sp.245 ARM,(6) P. polymyxa RC14, (7) B. megaterium RC10, (8) Mixed 2 (Bacillus OSU-142+Bacillus M3+ Azospirillum brasilense sp.245 + 40 kg N ha) in addition to the firstyear treatments. Greenhouse and the two years of field trials at two sites showed thatseed inoculation with bacterial strains significantly affected yield, yield componentsand quality parameters both in spring wheat and barley. In greenhouse trials, singleinoculations of seeds with PGPRs gave root and shoot weight increases by11.0-16.5% and 14.4-30.4% in wheat and by 10.3-18.8% and 11.9-21.5% in barley.Combinations of three bacteria increased root and shoots weight by 18.3-31.5% inwheat and by 21.4-23.8 in barley and bacterial inoculations also increased grainyield by 4.3-18.5% in wheat and 8.3-19.1% in barley, respectively. In field conditions wheat grain yields were increased by 25.6-40.4%, 17.4-25.2% and31.4% while barley seed yield were increased by 16.2-33.7%, 4.2-14.4 and 16.8%with N fertilizer, single and combinations of PGPR bacteria inoculations comparedto control. Plant-growth responses were variable and depended on the inoculantsstrain, plant species and growth parameters evaluated. In conclusion, seedinoculations with bacteria especially B. OSU-142, A. brasilense sp.245 andcombinations of bacteria may satisfy nitrogen requirements of wheat and barleyunder green house and field conditions even in lowland and upland areas. Thepresent results indicate that the selected bacterial isolates and multiplecombinations did promote the growth and quality of wheat and barley in ways thatcould be harnessed to practical benefit for the farmer and consistent withsustainable and/or organic agricultural practices in Turkey.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single PGPR inoculation increased wheat root weight by 11.0–16.5%.

Treatment
singleinoculations of seeds with PGPRse0
Outcome
roote0
Direction
increasese0
Value
11.0-16.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“singleinoculations of seeds with PGPRs gave root and shoot weight increases by11.0-16.5% and 14.4-30.4% in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single PGPR inoculation increased wheat shoot weight by 14.4–30.4%.

Treatment
singleinoculations of seeds with PGPRse0
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
14.4-30.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“singleinoculations of seeds with PGPRs gave root and shoot weight increases by11.0-16.5% and 14.4-30.4% in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single PGPR inoculation increased barley root weight by 10.3–18.8%.

Treatment
singleinoculations of seeds with PGPRse0
Outcome
root and shoot weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
10.3-18.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“singleinoculations of seeds with PGPRs gave root and shoot weight increases by11.0-16.5% and 14.4-30.4% in wheat and by 10.3-18.8% and 11.9-21.5% in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single PGPR inoculation increased barley shoot weight by 11.9–21.5%.

Treatment
singleinoculations of seeds with PGPRse0
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
11.9-21.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“singleinoculations of seeds with PGPRs gave root and shoot weight increases by11.0-16.5% and 14.4-30.4% in wheat and by 10.3-18.8% and 11.9-21.5% in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-bacterium combinations increased wheat root and shoot weight by 18.3–31.5%.

Treatment
Combinations of three bacteriae0
Outcome
root and shoots weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.3-31.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combinations of three bacteria increased root and shoots weight by 18.3-31.5% inwheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-bacterium combinations increased barley root and shoot weight by 21.4–23.8.

Treatment
Combinations of three bacteriae0
Outcome
root and shoots weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.4-23.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combinations of three bacteria increased root and shoots weight by 18.3-31.5% inwheat and by 21.4-23.8 in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations increased wheat grain yield by 4.3–18.5%.

Treatment
bacterial inoculationse0
Outcome
grainyielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.3-18.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculations also increased grainyield by 4.3-18.5% in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations increased barley grain yield by 8.3–19.1%.

Treatment
bacterial inoculationse0
Outcome
grainyielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.3-19.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial inoculations also increased grainyield by 4.3-18.5% in wheat and 8.3-19.1% in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased wheat field grain yield by 25.6–40.4% against control.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
wheat grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.6-40.4%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grain yields were increased by 25.6-40.4%, 17.4-25.2% and31.4% while barley seed yield were increased by 16.2-33.7%, 4.2-14.4 and 16.8%with N fertilizer, single and combinations of PGPR bacteria inoculations comparedto control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single bacterial inoculations increased wheat field grain yield by 17.4–25.2% against control.

Treatment
singlee0
Outcome
wheat grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.4-25.2%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grain yields were increased by 25.6-40.4%, 17.4-25.2% and31.4% while barley seed yield were increased by 16.2-33.7%, 4.2-14.4 and 16.8%with N fertilizer, single and combinations of PGPR bacteria inoculations comparedto control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacterial inoculation increased wheat field grain yield by 31.4% against control.

Treatment
combinations of PGPR bacteria inoculationse0
Outcome
wheat grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31.4%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grain yields were increased by 25.6-40.4%, 17.4-25.2% and31.4% while barley seed yield were increased by 16.2-33.7%, 4.2-14.4 and 16.8%with N fertilizer, single and combinations of PGPR bacteria inoculations comparedto control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased barley field seed yield by 16.2–33.7% against control.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
barley seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.2-33.7%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seed yield were increased by 16.2-33.7%, 4.2-14.4 and 16.8%with N fertilizer, single and combinations of PGPR bacteria inoculations comparedto control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single bacterial inoculations increased barley field seed yield by 4.2–14.4 against control.

Treatment
singlee0
Outcome
barley seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.2-14.4e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seed yield were increased by 16.2-33.7%, 4.2-14.4 and 16.8%with N fertilizer, single and combinations of PGPR bacteria inoculations comparedto control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacterial inoculation increased barley field seed yield by 16.8% against control.

Treatment
combinations of PGPR bacteria inoculationse0
Outcome
barley seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.8%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seed yield were increased by 16.2-33.7%, 4.2-14.4 and 16.8%with N fertilizer, single and combinations of PGPR bacteria inoculations comparedto control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial seed inoculation significantly affected yield, yield components and quality in wheat.

Treatment
seed inoculation with bacterial strainse0
Outcome
yield, yield componentsand quality parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed inoculation with bacterial strains significantly affected yield, yield componentsand quality parameters both in spring wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial seed inoculation significantly affected yield, yield components and quality in barley.

Treatment
seed inoculation with bacterial strainse0
Outcome
yield, yield componentsand quality parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed inoculation with bacterial strains significantly affected yield, yield componentsand quality parameters both in spring wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1402 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: general · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
    Inoculated barley yielded less than sprayed barley.

    Analysis of the Effects of Erysiphe graminis DC. on the Growth of Barley · 1962 · compared with barley repeatedly sprayed with lime sulphur

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.