Paper · 2019 · Forests

Plasticity of Plant N Uptake in Two Native Species in Response to Invasive Species

Yi-Heng Hu; Yu-Lu Zhou; Jun-Qin Gao; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Survival competition caused by limiting nutrients is often strong between invasive and native plant species. The effects of plant invasion on nutrient uptake in plant growth remain largely unclear. Clarifying how invasive plants affect N uptake by natives will provide a better understanding on mechanisms responsible for plant invasion. A 15N-labeling experiment was conducted using two common invasive species (Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. and Wedelia trilobata (L.) Hitchc.) and their native congeners (A. sessilis (L.) DC. and W. chinensis (Osbeck.) Merr.) to examine their growth and uptake of NH4+, NO3−, and glycine when grown in monocultures and mixed cultures. All plants were grown in a greenhouse for 70 days for labelling and biomass measurements. The main factor affecting N uptake by the four species was the form of N, rather than species identity. In all of the species, the most N was taken up in the form of NH4+, followed by NO3− and glycine. The two invasive species grew faster, with stable N-uptake patterns despite more moderate uptake rates of N than the native species. Native species were strongly affected by the invasive species. The presence of invasive species caused the N-uptake rates of the natives to be reduced, with altered N-uptake patterns, but did not substantially alter their growth rates. Native species reduced their N-uptake rates but increased N-use efficiency through altering N-uptake patterns in the presence of invasive plants. Such a flexible N-uptake pattern could be an important survival strategy for native plants in competition with invaders.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The form of N, rather than species identity, was the main factor affecting N uptake by the four species.

Taxon
four speciese1
Treatment
form of Ne1
Outcome
N uptakee1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The main factor affecting N uptake by the four species was the form of N, rather than species identity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In all four species the most N was taken up as NH4+, followed by NO3− and glycine.

Taxon
all of the speciese1
Outcome
the most N was taken up in the form of NH4+, followed by NO3− and glycinee1

Verbatim

e1

“In all of the species, the most N was taken up in the form of NH4+, followed by NO3− and glycine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–975 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two invasive species grew faster than the native species.

Taxon
two invasive speciese1
Outcome
grew fastere1
Comparator
native speciese1

Verbatim

e1

“The two invasive species grew faster, with stable N-uptake patterns despite more moderate uptake rates of N than the native species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two invasive species had stable N-uptake patterns.

Taxon
two invasive speciese1
Outcome
stable N-uptake patternse1

Verbatim

e1

“The two invasive species grew faster, with stable N-uptake patterns despite more moderate uptake rates of N than the native species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two invasive species had more moderate N uptake rates than the native species.

Taxon
two invasive speciese1
Outcome
uptake rates of Ne1
Direction
more moderatee1
Comparator
native speciese1

Verbatim

e1

“The two invasive species grew faster, with stable N-uptake patterns despite more moderate uptake rates of N than the native species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of invasive species reduced the N-uptake rates of the native species.

Taxon
nativese1
Treatment
presence of invasive speciese1
Interactor
invasive speciese1other
Outcome
N-uptake ratese1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The presence of invasive species caused the N-uptake rates of the natives to be reduced, with altered N-uptake patterns, but did not substantially alter their growth rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of invasive species altered the N-uptake patterns of the native species.

Taxon
nativese1
Treatment
presence of invasive speciese1
Interactor
invasive speciese1other
Outcome
N-uptake patternse1
Direction
alterede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The presence of invasive species caused the N-uptake rates of the natives to be reduced, with altered N-uptake patterns, but did not substantially alter their growth rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of invasive species did not substantially alter the growth rates of the native species.

Taxon
nativese1
Treatment
presence of invasive speciese1
Interactor
invasive speciese1other
Outcome
growth ratese1
Direction
did not substantially altere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The presence of invasive species caused the N-uptake rates of the natives to be reduced, with altered N-uptake patterns, but did not substantially alter their growth rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native species increased N-use efficiency by altering N-uptake patterns in the presence of invasive plants.

Taxon
Native speciese1
Treatment
presence of invasive plantse1
Interactor
invasive plantse1other
Outcome
N-use efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Native species reduced their N-uptake rates but increased N-use efficiency through altering N-uptake patterns in the presence of invasive plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1490 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that a flexible N-uptake pattern could be an important survival strategy for native plants competing with invaders.

Taxon
native plantse1
Interactor
invaderse1other
Outcome
survival strategye1
Qualifier
flexible N-uptake patterne1

Verbatim

e1

“Such a flexible N-uptake pattern could be an important survival strategy for native plants in competition with invaders”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1611 · show in text ↑