Paper · 2019 · Environment and Natural Resources Journal

Effects of Volcanic Zeolite Tuff on Olive (Olea Europaea L.) Growth and Soil Chemistry under a Constant Water Level: Five Years’ Monitoring Experience

Jalal. A. Al-Tabbal; Naji. K. Al-Mefleh; Kamel. K. Al-Zboon; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of using fine and coarse volcanic zeolite tuff on the growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees and the silty clay soil in which they were grown. Olive trees were grown in four different soil treatments: silty clay soil (S1, control), silty clay soil covered with coarse volcanic zeolite tuff (S2), silty clay soil mixed with fine volcanic zeolite tuff (S3), and silty clay soil mixed with fine volcanic zeolite tuff covered with coarse volcanic zeolite tuff (S4). The morphological and physiological characteristics of the olive plants were then monitored over a 5-year period from 2012 to 2016, and the leaf and soil chemistry were analyzed at the end of the monitoring period. It was found that the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1). Furthermore, the contents of N and P in the plant leaves, and most of the soil chemical parameters measured significantly increased following the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff. These results highlight the benefits of using volcanic zeolite tuff as a natural, readily available, and low-cost material for soil amendment due to its large effects on plant growth and soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S2 increased olive shoot length by 10% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S3 increased olive shoot length by 21% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S3e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S4 increased olive shoot length by 29% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S4e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S2 increased olive plant height by 0.53% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
0.53%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S3 increased olive plant height by 1.29% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S3e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
1.29%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S4 increased olive plant height by 3.5% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S4e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
3.5%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S2 increased olive plant weight by 13% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
plant weighte0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S3 increased olive plant weight by 22% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S3e0
Outcome
plant weighte0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S4 increased olive plant weight by 32.26% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S4e0
Outcome
plant weighte0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
32.26%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S2 increased olive number of branches by 14% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S3 increased olive number of branches by 27% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S3e0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S4 increased olive number of branches by 41.5% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S4e0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
41.5%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S2 increased olive number of leaves by 9% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S3 increased olive number of leaves by 22% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S3e0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S4 increased olive number of leaves by 43% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S4e0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
43%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S2 increased olive trunk diameter by 9% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
trunk diametere0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S3 increased olive trunk diameter by 22% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S3e0
Outcome
trunk diametere0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S4 increased olive trunk diameter by 29% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S4e0
Outcome
trunk diametere0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S2 increased olive shoot diameter by 12% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
shoot diametere0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite treatment S3 increased olive shoot diameter by 22% against soil control.

Taxon
olive (Olea europaea L.) treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
S3e0
Outcome
shoot diametere0
Direction
positive effecte0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
control treatment (S1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of volcanic zeolite tuff (treatments S2, S3, and S4) had a positive effect on shoot length (relative increases of 10%, 21%, and 29%, respectively), plant height (0.53%, 1.29%, and 3.5%), plant weight (13%, 22%, and 32.26%), number of branches (14%, 27%, and 41.5%), number of leaves (9%, 22%, and 43%), trunk diameter (9%, 22%, and 29%), and shoot diameter (12%, 22%, and 36%), as well as the relative water content (15%, 22%, and 36%) and leaf water potential (16%, 26%, and 32%) compared with the control treatment (S1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–130 · show in text ↑