Abstract
Abstract Aims Mechanisms of plant drought resistance include both tolerance and avoidance. Xylem vulnerability to embolism and turgor loss point are considered traits that confer tolerance, while leaf abscission and deciduousness characterizes the avoidance strategy. While these mechanisms are thought to trade-off expressing a continuum among species, little is known on how variation in the timing and duration of leaf shedding in response to drought affect the relationship between xylem and leaf tolerance. In the present study, we explored the extent to which drought tolerance differs between two oak (Quercus) species that exhibit different leaf shedding behaviours. Particularly, we predicted that Q. deserticola Trel., which loses leaves at the end of the dry season (late-deciduous) and is thus exposed to a greater risk of cavitation, would be more drought tolerant and more conservative in its water use than Q. laeta Liebm., which loses its leaves for only a short period of time in the middle of the dry season (brevideciduous). Methods The study was conducted in central Mexico in a single population of each of the two oak species, separated from each other by a distance of 1.58 km, and by an altitudinal difference of 191 m. Quercus deserticola (late deciduous) is more frequent down slope, while Q. laeta (brevideciduous) tends to occur at higher elevations along the gradient. We assessed seasonal differences (rainy versus dry season) in native stem hydraulic conductivity, and tested for variation in xylem vulnerability to cavitation, leaf water use and leaf turgor loss point between the two species. Important Findings The two oak species did not differ in traits conferring drought tolerance, including xylem vulnerability to embolism, leaf turgor loss point, or stomatal conductance. However, both species had different performance during the dry season; the brevideciduous species had lower negative impact in the xylem function than the late-deciduous species. Overall, seasonal changes in plant physiological performance between the two oak species were determined by a reduction in the canopy leaf area.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The two oak species did not differ in xylem vulnerability to embolism, leaf turgor loss point or stomatal conductance.
- Outcome
- xylem vulnerability to embolism, leaf turgor loss point, or stomatal conductancee1
- Qualifier
- did not differe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The two oak species did not differ in traits conferring drought tolerance, including xylem vulnerability to embolism, leaf turgor loss point, or stomatal conductance”
Claim · model-written summary
In the dry season the brevideciduous oak species had lower negative impact on xylem function than the late-deciduous species.
- Material
- brevideciduous speciese2
- Outcome
- negative impact in the xylem functione2
- Direction
- lowere2
- Comparator
- late-deciduous speciese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“the brevideciduous species had lower negative impact in the xylem function than the late-deciduous species”
e4“each of the two oak species”
Claim · model-written summary
Seasonal changes in physiological performance between the two oak species were determined by a reduction in canopy leaf area.
- Outcome
- seasonal changes in plant physiological performancee3
- Qualifier
- a reduction in the canopy leaf areae3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“seasonal changes in plant physiological performance between the two oak species were determined by a reduction in the canopy leaf area”